[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 10:13:48 +1100
heiko.grussbach@crpht.lu wrote:
> I have the following problem, I want to define an element E that may
> contain elements A,B,C. Order should be insignificant and A,B and C are all
> optional. Furthermore, A,B and C may each be replaced by X.
If more elements were to be added as children of E, the exponential combinations would make maintenance of content models untenable - it's
reasonable then to conclude that this is not an appropriate approach from the outset. I would use something like:
<!ELEMENT E (A | B | C | X)*>
and use a schema or XSL to advise when elements are found to behave in a way contrary to your intentions but not expressed by the content model.
BTW, this question is probably more suited to 'General discussion of Extensible Markup Language <XML-L@listserv.heanet.ie>'.
--
Regards,
Marcus Carr email: mrc@allette.com.au
___________________________________________________________________
Allette Systems (Australia) www: http://www.allette.com.au
___________________________________________________________________
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."
- Einstein
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|