[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Richard Anderson" <rja@arpsolutions.demon.co.uk>
- To: "David Megginson" <david@megginson.com>,"XMLDev list" <xml-dev-digest@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 13:43:40 -0000
> > > We could still have the callbacks throw SAXException, if that's what
> > > people prefer.
> >
> > Yes Please. Exception really dont work well in VB and several other
> > langauges.
>
> I'm not quite sure I understand -- if exceptions don't work well in a
> language, then neither a general IOException nor a specific
> SAXException would be appropriate.
Provided we just have a class that represents an exception, which is passed
via a callback and doesnt depend on the usual java/C++ throw() mechanisms
I'll be happy.
Also, if we dont derive any of the SAX interfaces from anything that isnt
available in all langauges, I'll be even happlier.
Cheers.
Rich.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
