[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: james anderson <James.Anderson@mecomnet.de>
- To: XML List <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2000 17:53:07 +0100
Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> We don't yet have a concrete syntax for indicating an association
> between "no namespace" and a schema in xsi:schemaLocation.
Wait. Is this really saying that one is looking for a way to encode the
specification, that a symbol, so encoded as to denote that it is in no
namespace, is really to be taken to be identical with another symbol, so
encoded as to denote that it is in another, definite namespace?
Isn't this impossible by definition?
> need to fill this gap. The locally-scoped element declaration issue
> doesn't arise in this case, or rather both interpretations give the
> same answer.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|