Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: John Aldridge <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2000 17:13:00 +0000
At 08:40 21/12/99 +0100, you wrote:
>> John is absolutely correct. It *must* be wchar_t if its going to be
>> a fixed thing.
>Please note that John was advocating std::wstring, rather than
Er, sort of. I _do_ advocate std::wstring, but that's independent of the
point I was making here. I can live with wchar_t* if the consensus is that
std::wstring is either too slow or too poorly supported.
What I'd find difficult is a typedef SAXChar which could be "unsigned
short", because that would be a real bore to code to.
std::basic_string<SAXChar> would be just as bad.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)