[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com
- To: Francis Norton <francis@redrice.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2000 21:21:34 -0700
> As David Brownell points out, this could be achieved by having an
> xpath-in-DOM implementation that ran on top of your DOM. That way your
> xpath expressions could return live DOM nodes and you'd avoid DOM bloat.
> Though I'm not sure that such a nicely de-coupled approach would be as
> efficient as the messier bloatware implementations that do it all in
> one?
I very often run into non-rigourous invocations of "DOM bloat". Note that DOM
is a very large interface, but there is no reason that implementations have to
be large as well.
> BTW, I like the factory proposal that you recommended to Lauren Wood to
> avoid spec bloat.
I wish I could take credit for the excellent idea, but I can't. Leigh Dodds
is the scurvy scoundrel in this case.
--
Uche Ogbuji
FourThought LLC, IT Consultants
uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com (970)481-0805
Software engineering, project management, Intranets and Extranets
http://FourThought.com http://OpenTechnology.org
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|