[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- To: xml-dev <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2000 13:23:51 -0800
At 03:47 PM 1/6/00 -0500, Bob Kline wrote:
>OK. If I understand your last paragraph, you're saying the opposite of
>what David M. said earlier in the thread ("[f]or most applications ...
>the answer is a firm 'no' [the two examples are *not* identical]") -
>right?
Er, I guess so... did David really mean that? In my experience we have
got a lot of complaints saying "obviously the two are identical, you
should have made it compulsory" and very few (none?) saying "you should have
disallowed treating them as equivalent".
I think we did the right thing. -T.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
