Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: "Clark C. Evans" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Tim Bray <email@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 23:00:47 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Tim Bray wrote:
> >1. Are there any use cases besides HTML
> > for mixed content?
> Virtually every document- or publishing-oriented
> application in the world.
Let me re-phrase this. Are there examples of mixed-model
use-cases, where one DTD does not have mixed-content,
and a subordinate/contained DTD (ANY) does use mixed-content.
For example, often times people put HTML inside eCommerce
"description" fields, texts which are otherwise free of
mixed content. (Hence the modular XHTML effort)
Anyway, I feel stupid for not phrasing the question
correctly... I even did some SGML publishing work
3 years back using Omnimark. So sorry.
> >2. For modular XHTML, could a <xhtml:plain>
> > element be included that eliminates
> > the need for mixed-content?
> Sure. Why would this be better? -Tim
Well, the proposal is, in-essence, what the DOM model
of XML does for all content -- however, given that XHTML
will most likely be machine generated anyway; this
little tweak would allow a non-mixed content API to
be useable for eCommerce work. Moving XHTML into
the "special case" category.
So, I guess I was really trying to ask:
1. How common is mixed model XML usage, where
a mixed-content DTD is used as a subordinate
document to a non-mixed-content model.
2. Would it make sense to allow include
<xhtml:plain> as a no-op for cases where
xhtml mixed-content is included in eCommerce
So. I was wondering if XHTML should be
This is in-essence what the DOM model does for all content, and it makes
hard for strict non-mixed use cases.
So, I was wondering if XHTML should
not assume mixed-content
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.