[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
- To: Miles Sabin <msabin@cromwellmedia.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 12:35:53 -0800
Miles Sabin wrote:
>
> > > [snip: table mapping to intern'd Strings]
> > > Even tho' this only requires one java-intern for each
> > > distinct name it still provides plenty of opportunities for
> > > synchronization collisions.
So Miles, if you prefer the occasional synchronization issue
to the routine method invocation overhead, use a parser that
obliges you. (Yes, I'm assuming SAX2 doesn't mandate any
interning, just exposes whether or not it's done.)
Though I daresay you'll find that the synchronization isn't
usually measurable, while your evidently preferred alternative
(lots of String.equals calls) will consistently show up as a
performance problem. At least that's been the case when I've
made such measurements.
- Dave
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
|