xml-dev - Re: Great controversies of XML

Re: Great controversies of XML

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 10:47:01 -0800

And certainly an XML-DEV controversy, about "greater XML":

   Why aren't W3C processes really open?

;-)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

References:
- Re: Great controversies of XML
  - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Re: Great controversies of XML
  - From: Len Bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
- Re: Great controversies of XML
  - From: Len Bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Draft of Paper: Using UML to Define XML DTDs
Next by Date: Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
Previous by thread: Re: Great controversies of XML
Next by thread: RE: Great controversies of XML
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread