[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Len Bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
- To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 21:40:19 -0600
Tim Bray wrote:
>
> And if a browser doesn't support XML+DOM, it doesn't support XML. -Tim
Nice thought but isn't it more like XML+DOM(HTML), XML+DOM(SVG),
XML+DOM(VRML),
in other words, as far as I can tell watching the Great Children Node
War,
DOM can be thought of as optional as long as the application language
API
is complete. The SAI for VRML according to the last
vote, must be standalone and must operate identically over both
current encodings.
So is DOM really required for XML 1.0, or is that a political position
about implementations?
umm... that subject line looks sort of... alternative.
len
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@ic.ac.uk the message
unsubscribe xml-dev (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
|
