[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
- To: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@idsonline.com>
- Date: 24 Jan 2000 09:09:13 +0000
"Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@idsonline.com> writes:
> <snip/>
>
> The IETF won't bless an RFC until there are two independent implementations.
> I think this is the right kind of approach. Surely, Tim B's Lark
> implementation must have been a great help to the XML committee (I'm
> guessing, I don't really know anything about its role). There's nothing
> like trying to build to a spec to uncover its lack of clarity.
The W3C has recently introduced a status of Candidate Recommendation
which we expect most RECs to pass through, which is specifically
designed for implementation feedback. XML Schema is certainly
intending to take advantage of this.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@ic.ac.uk the message
unsubscribe xml-dev (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
|
