Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Richard Tobin)
- To: email@example.com
- Date: 26 Jan 2000 13:02:32 GMT
In article <003901bf6776$5d426f20$0201a8c0@tomshp>,
Thomas B. Passin <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>The XML rec says
For character references, the table in 4.4 specifies "Included" rather
then "Included in literal", but in any case, the first point in
section 3.3.3 ("a character reference is processed...") must be
explaining the same thing (rather than something that happens
afterwards), otherwise there would be no character references present.
The algorithm in 3.3.3 applied to a non-CDATA attribute
will first replace the character reference with a tab character, so we
space tab space
Then the "further processing" will do nothing, because there are no
sequences of more than one space character.
The only way that the tab could become a space is if both the first
and third points of section 3.3.3 were applied to it, but the natural
reading is that those points are alternatives.
Spam filter: to mail me from a .com/.net site, put my surname in the headers.
"The Internet is really just a series of bottlenecks joined by high
speed networks." - Sam Wilson
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to firstname.lastname@example.org the message
unsubscribe xml-dev (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.