[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: 29 Jan 2000 13:12:00 +0000
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@techno.com> writes:
> XML Schema *does not* address the problem of validating mixed
> vocabularies.
Um, I know we've taken a lot of stick for releasing interim drafts
with less than pelucid prose, but I would have thought Chapter 4 of
the current PWD [1] makes it clear that _if_ I've understood you correctly
in your use of the word 'vocabularies', XML Schema certainly does
address the problem, and I think solves it pretty well. It certainly
addresses the question of how a document containing multiple
namespace-qualified information items can arrange for them to be
validated by independent, pre-existing schemas for those namespaces.
ht
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-xmlschema-1-19991217/
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@ic.ac.uk the message
unsubscribe xml-dev (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
|
