[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- To: Eliot Kimber <drmacro@drmacro.com>
- Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2000 20:45:16 -0800
At 10:36 PM 1/30/00 -0600, Eliot Kimber wrote:
>> But at this point in history it seems obvious that of
>> the 3 models of work we have before us (ISO, IETF, W3C), none can be
>> said to have been shown to be either triumphant or bankrupt, based
>> on results. The most likely conclusion is that they excel in different
>> problem domains.
>
>I want to second this
And for those who don't know, Eliot's been way deep into two of 'em.
Anyone here been around all three? -T.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions and unsubscriptions
are now ***CLOSED*** in preparation for list transfer to OASIS.
|
