Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Len Bullard <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: "W. Eliot Kimber" <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 18:58:57 -0600
W. Eliot Kimber wrote:
> It's important to remember that XML simplified SGML *syntax*. It did not
> (and could not) simplify the underlying abstract data model (except
> where the SGML data model reflects optional features, like attributes
> for notations).
> This is why the idea that XML is *fundamentally* simpler that SGML is a
> Big Lie. The cost of entry is lower, but the total cost of ownership is
> essentially the same.
Good call, E. However, let's also remember that a strength of SGML,
I usually simply say markup systems these days, is that given some
value, the trend is for cost to go down when compared to other systems.