[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Stefan Haustein <stefan.haustein@trantor.de>
- To: THOMAS PASSIN <tpassin@idsonline.com>, XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@xml.org>
- Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 19:03:38 +0100
THOMAS PASSIN wrote:
>
(...)
>
> Using OOP to build an application does not automatically require that every
> piece of the schema be an OOP object. That might or might not be a useful
> approach. An XML document may be used in a large number of ways, requiring
> different methods. So I don't think that the WD is headed in the wrong
> direction here.
While I agree to your statement, I do not understand the conclusion:
Wouldn't a simplified XML Schena spec help all processors, regardless
if they are OOP or not?
Or do you see a concrete advantage of the type/element distinction
in your application field?
Best regards
Stefan
--
SAX-based access to WBXML and WML: http://www.trantor.de/wbxml
XML pull parser: http://www.trantor.de/xml
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html
***************************************************************************
|