OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   Re: Schema concepts

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]
  • From: Stefan Haustein <stefan.haustein@trantor.de>
  • To: THOMAS PASSIN <tpassin@idsonline.com>, XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@xml.org>
  • Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 19:03:38 +0100

> Using OOP to build an application does not automatically require that every
> piece of the schema be an OOP object.  That might or might not be a useful
> approach.  An XML document may be used in a large number of ways, requiring
> different methods.  So I don't think that the WD is headed in the wrong
> direction here.

While I agree to your statement, I do not understand the conclusion:
Wouldn't a simplified XML Schena spec help all processors, regardless
if they are OOP or not? 

Or do you see a concrete advantage of the type/element distinction
in your application field?

Best regards


SAX-based access to WBXML and WML: http://www.trantor.de/wbxml
XML pull parser: http://www.trantor.de/xml

This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS