[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- To: xml-dev@xml.org, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
- Date: 25 Feb 2000 06:20:57 -0500
Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net> writes:
> > Generally speaking, a complicated design is a bad design.
>
> I'd like to see the mathematical proof for that one! Once again you
> are introducing value judgements.
Jeff's proof would be a statistical one, not a mathematical one. His
argument, which would probably be born out by investigation, is that
all other things being the same a more complicated design is
significantly less likely to be implemented fully than a simpler
design.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@megginson.com
http://www.megginson.com/
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html
***************************************************************************
|
