[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Stefan Haustein <haustein@kimo.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
- To: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 16:01:59 +0100
David Megginson wrote:
>
> The problem is that the model as presented is naively simple, and the
> WG failed to notice that the XML syntax is not based directly on that
> simple model.
>
So the question arises "Is the model over-simplified,
is the XML syntax uneccesary complicated, or both?"
Best regards,
Stefan
--
Stefan Haustein
University of Dortmund
Computer Science VIII
www-ai.cs.uni-dortmund.de
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html
***************************************************************************
|
