[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- To: Michael Fuller <msf@io.mds.rmit.edu.au>
- Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 13:09:25 -0500 (EST)
Michael Fuller writes:
> I'm not sure if that's the case. I've partially wrapped SP and (without
> actually checking ;-), I've got a funny feeling that it may not always
> report DTD events in lexical order. Regardless, given that a DTD is loosely
> unordered (other than needing to define entities before their use), is there
> any useful reason to constrain parsers to a lexical ordering of DTD events?
I don't think so, but I think that they should be properly nested in
start/endEntity events (or maybe not -- do people care?).
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@megginson.com
http://www.megginson.com/
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|
