[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Toby Speight <Toby.Speight@streapadair.freeserve.co.uk>
- To: "XML developers' list" <xml-dev@xml.org>
- Date: 07 Mar 2000 15:37:25 +0000
Philip> Philip Nye <URL:mailto:philipnye@freenet.co.uk>
0> In article <38C38BB9.E5BFAFC3@freenet.co.uk>, Philip wrote:
Philip> I cannot quite follow your axioms here. Taking bare XML syntax
Philip> without reference to any particular schema language, I would
Philip> rephrase the table thus.
Philip>
Philip> Elements Attributes
Philip> Ordered? schema dependent schema dependent
Philip> Uniqueness? schema dependent schema dependent
Philip> structured? schema dependent No
Philip>
Philip> Am I wrong? Is there anything in the syntax apart from DTDs
Philip> which forces unique unordered attributes?
"WFC: Unique Att Spec" on production 40 forces uniqueness. There's
no such constraint on orderedness, though you may be unable to use
standard parsers if you want to preserve order.
--
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|
