[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@icl.com>
- To: "'Yihpyng Kuan'" <kuan3rd@yahoo.com>, xml-dev@xml.org
- Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:41:38 +0100
> If I have a table T1(F1 char(10), F2 char(10));
> I have 3 rows for this table.
> The XML representation of this would like this -
There are many different XML representations of this, with different
trade-offs. If the number of bytes is your biggest constraint (and you don't
want to use compression), you could use
<r>value 1<c/>value 2<c/>value 3<c/>value 4</r>
which is almost as compact as comma-separated values, and easy to convert
(using SAX) to something more meaningful.
Mike Kay
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|