[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: James Tauber <JTauber@bowstreet.com>
- To: "'Tim Bray'" <tbray@textuality.com>, xml-dev@XML.ORG
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 17:22:13 -0400
One of the problems I have with it is that it makes the mistake (as similar
articles do) of confusing XML with a particular vocabulary and seems to
suggest that if a particular XML vocabulary fails, then XML has therefore
failed.
James
> http://www.zdnet.com/pcweek/stories/news/0,4153,2551691,00.html
>
> The analysis is kind of dumb, but some of the reportage is
> worth reading. -T.
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|
