[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: tpassin@home.com
- To: <xml-dev@xml.org>
- Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 22:11:23 -0400
Richard Tobin asked a follow on question:
I can't find any justification for it; is there a generic URI
> rule anywhere that says a URI with no file://host part is equivalent to
the
> same with an empty string as the host?
>
Well, the RFC is very clear: you either use "file://hostname/" (you may use
"localhost" for the local machine) or you use an empty string for the
hostname, getting "file:///". Lets hope some else can enlighten us further.
Tom Passin
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|
