[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- To: Laura Neitzel <laura.neitzel@moai.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 17:29:53 -0400
Laura Neitzel wrote:
> I'm sorry, i must not have explained the problem well enough. I realize that
> SAX is event based and I believe that the error HAS occured when it reaches
> the end of teh element in question (the "Add" element). I just assumed that
> the parser would perform the validation BEFORE it fires teh event, not
> after.
I'm not clear on when you see the error. Is it when the offending second
element is seen, or when the container element is closed? Either is a plausible
implementation strategy. Expecting an error to be fired *before* the
previous element is ended is probably too much to ask.
A possibility: create the object in memory when you see the initial
endElement, check for validity when you see the container's endElement.
--
Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|