[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- To: connolly@w3.org
- Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 15:36:04 +0100 (BST)
> We have documented this since Feb '98, when XML 1.0 became
> a recommendation despite the lack of namespace support:
> -- http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/NOTE-webarch-extlang-19980210#Evolving
One would have assumed though that a later REC would supersede any
comments in an early NOTE. The description of namespace that you quote
there may have been the intention at the time (and clearly is what you
wish namespaces had become) but it is nothing like the concept of
namespace defined in the namespace rec.
David
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|