[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Taba Miklos <miklos.taba@innovativeideasoy.com>
- To: xml-editor@w3.org, "xml-dev@xml.org" <xml-dev@xml.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 12:43:20 +0300
John Cowan wrote:
>
> The XML Core WG would like input from the xml-dev public, particularly
> those of you who have implemented XML parsers, on the following points:
>
> Issue PE28:
>
> Currently the XML Recommendation is silent about the handling of
> documents that contain "impossible" bytes. For example, the byte 0xFF
> cannot appear in any UTF-8 encoded document. We are considering making
> such violations of the encoding a fatal error.
>
...
That sounds very good.
Supposing the two possibiliy:
1. "impossible" bytes are fatal error
- A severe application is glad, easy implementation is possible.
- A relaxed application has some overhead to prepare the input
for a strict parser.
2. "impossible"bytes are swallowed
- A severe application has difficulties to preprocess
the input source, if it can at all.
- A relaxed application is satisfied.
I think the XML Core WG should support rather the strict
applications. Also, imho, any relaxed rule can
cause great interoperability problems.
BR
--
miklos.taba@innovativeideasoy.com
Innovative Ideas Oy, Helsinki
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|
