[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk>
- To: mrc@allette.com.au
- Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 09:41:09 +0100 (BST)
Marcus Carr writes:
> So if you wanted to use a different FO application to render that
> book, you would likely have to go back to the source document and
> redo your page breaks, right?
Yes, definitely. But how big a job is that, compared to translating the
style rules from (say) LaTeX to Framemaker. If I have to switch to a
new FO formatter, I have a not inconsiderable task on my hands,
if I want to rerun old jobs. But the effort I put into instantiating
design rules as FOs remains, and I claim that I am ahead of the game.
> If the two applications used different hyphenation dictionaries, there is a
> distinct possibility that the page breaks would change in a 300 page book.
every time ..... never mind, just how they interpret font
metrics. applications use their own ideas about default inter-word
spacing, because its not part of a font metric
> are benefits in everyone using the same terminology, but I believe
> that FOs are intended to fulfill a much bigger role than that. My
> understanding is that they're supposed to "free us from the
> shackles of formatting applications", but
> I've yet to be convinced that they can deliver this.
I am with you there. The unshackling notion sounds fanciful
Sebastian Rahtz
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|