[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>, XML Developers List <xml-dev@xml.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 14:26:46 -0700
At 03:40 PM 16/06/00 -0500, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>Somewhere in my dim memory I recall an
>argument about using periods in generic
>identifers and why that is a bad thing
>in XML while not forbidden. Can someone
>please enlighten me with an explanation or URL
>to this notion?
>
><confused.notion></confused.notion>
I can't think of a single thing wrong with doing this. You won't
be able to map element types to java class names unless the
package hierarchy matches your naming convention. But I think the
direct-java-mapping (or perl or whatever) never was going to work
that well anyhow, you usually end up needing a dispatch table for
some reason or another.-T
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|
