[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Bob Kline <bkline@rksystems.com>
- To: Jonathan Robie <Jonathan.Robie@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 16:28:20 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, Jonathan Robie wrote:
> There is very little difference between XQL'98 and the abbreviated
> syntax of XPath. XQL '98 may best be regarded as a predecessor of
> XPath.
>
> Most of the kinds of queries people tend to do with SQL may be done
> on a native XML representation using a query language called Quilt
> (http://almaden.ibm.com/cs/people/chamberlin/quilt.html), which uses
> the abbreviated syntax of XPath, but also provides tree construction
> and joins. This seems more natural than mixing XQL and XPath - it
> uses one XML model for the data, instead of combining a relational
> model with an XML model.
Could you check the URL? That host isn't showing up in DNS (I tried
several DNS servers).
--
Bob Kline
mailto:bkline@rksystems.com
http://www.rksystems.com
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|
