[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
- To: johns@syscore.com (John F. Schlesinger)
- Date: 06 Jul 2000 10:40:31 +0100
Sorry for continuing confusion.
Elements in instances covered by local declarations are
required to be _unqualified_, if the 'form' attribute of that
declaration is 'unqualified', or absent and the 'elementFormDefault'
attribute higher up is 'unqualified'.
Elements in instances covered by local declarations are
required to be _qualified_, if the 'form' attribute of that
declaration is 'qualified', or absent and the 'elementFormDefault'
attribute higher up is 'qualified'.
'Qualified' and 'unqualified' are _not_ the same as 'prefixed' and
'unprefixed' (for elements). Your example document had _unprefixed_,
_qualified_ names for its elements (because it had a default namespace
declaration).
So your schema needs to have form='qualified', or
elementFormDefault='qualified', in order to schema-validate your
instance.
There is indeed a misprint in the primer: as I hope the context around
it makes clear, the relevant sentence in section 3.1 [1] should read
"In po1.xsd we globally specify the qualification of elements and
attributes by setting the values of both elementFormDefault and
attributeFormDefault to unqualified."
Hope this helps.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|