[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
- To: xml-dev@xml.org
- Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2000 01:58:23 -0500
Michael Brennan wrote:
>
> ...
>
> I strongly agree with the above statement. Too many parties have tried to
> get version 1.0 of the schema spec to solve too many problems. I think the
> vast majority of developers just want the DTD functionality in XML syntax
> with stronger data types now and are willing to wait for the other stuff as
> they better digest the implications.
Many of the complex features in XML Schema are intended to emulate
sophisticated uses of DTDs. XML Schema will have a whole new problem if
competent DTD designers will not move to Schemas because they are not as
powerful as DTDs.
--
Paul Prescod - Not encumbered by corporate consensus
"Computer Associates is expected to come in with better than expected
earnings." Bob O'Brien, quoted in
- http://www.fool.com/news/2000/foth000316.htm
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|
