[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Chris Pratt" <chris@planetpratt.com>
- To: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <clbullar@ingr.com>, <xml-dev@xml.org>
- Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2000 16:26:46 -0700
I think you've completely missed the point. I was asking about the
technical aspects of including multiple DTD's into a single XML file, not
the Zen aspects of how to create multiple DTD's. We have already settled on
using XHTML as the default namespace and having one or more of our own
namespaces mixed in from different DTD's.
(*Chris*)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
To: "Chris Pratt" <chris@planetpratt.com>; <xml-dev@xml.org>
Sent: Sunday, July 09, 2000 10:57 AM
Subject: RE: Multiple DTD's
> Yes. Make them smaller and focus them on
> event schedules. If you make a DTD general
> enough to cover all of the possible states,
> it is too weak to validate any one of them
> at a given state. Look at the enterprise
> of use and create multiple DTDs where the
> formal name is tied to the schedule.
>
> Len Bullard
> Intergraph Public Safety
> clbullar@ingr.com
> http://fly.hiwaay.net/~cbullard/lensongs.ram
>
> Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
> Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Pratt [mailto:chris@planetpratt.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 3:43 PM
> To: xml-dev@xml.org; Tim Bray
> Subject: Re: Multiple DTD's
>
>
> Is there a better way to utilize multiple DTD's?
> (*Chris*)
>
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|