xml-dev - Re: RDF or UML (Was RE: XML and Healthcare,RDF spec bug was: Re: Default

Re: RDF or UML (Was RE: XML and Healthcare,RDF spec bug was: Re: Default

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 09:53:11 -0400

Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> How does RDF stack up next to UML for modeling semantics?
> 
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000May/0154.html

Jonathan Borden
http://www.openhealth.org

Follow-Ups:
- RE: RDF or UML (Was RE: XML and Healthcare,RDF spec bug was: Re:Default Namespaces - why don't they apply toattributes?)
  - From: johns@syscore.com (John F. Schlesinger)

References:
- RDF or UML (Was RE: XML and Healthcare,RDF spec bug was: Re: Def ault Namespaces - why don't they apply toattributes?)
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>

Prev by Date: unsubscribe xml-dev
Next by Date: RE: RDF or UML (Was RE: XML and Healthcare,RDF spec bug was: Re:Default Namespaces - why don't they apply toattributes?)
Previous by thread: RDF or UML (Was RE: XML and Healthcare,RDF spec bug was: Re: Def ault Namespaces - why don't they apply toattributes?)
Next by thread: RE: RDF or UML (Was RE: XML and Healthcare,RDF spec bug was: Re:Default Namespaces - why don't they apply toattributes?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread