Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <email@example.com>
- To: Jonathan Borden <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Sean McGrath <email@example.com>,"Simon St.Laurent" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
- Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 10:04:07 -0500
Why? Precisely why?
Before we add one more stack of paper to the
already too dense stack of markup technical
specifications, we really need a defense for
"This is too hard" is just too dumb to
hear one more time in this saga.
Intergraph Public Safety
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Jonathan Borden [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Now that more
time has past, it is even more clear that while the concepts of the grove,
property sets and grove plans are still important, the particular syntax
specified in their implementation is not viable for widespread adoption.
I think the problem is that the SGML Property Set appears to have been
designed for machine, not human, consumption.