Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: John Cowan <email@example.com>
- To: Jeff Greif <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2000 18:01:09 -0400
Jeff Greif wrote:
> But I think it
> makes sense to be formal and explicit about the answer to #1 in order to
> frame the discussions about the others.
Be my guest. *I* need to get the job done.
> Whatever formal representation is
> used, the same formalism would help to highlight the differences between the
> information content subsets, even if it is not used for presentation in the
> spec, but is referred to there, even if non-normatively.
There is already an SGML Property Set, and if anyone volunteers to
express the Infoset as a grove plan of it, I will put the grove plan into
the Infoset draft. (Of course the WG may decide otherwise: I don't
Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <email@example.com>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)