[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
- To: abrahams@acm.org, xml-dev@xml.org
- Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 16:46:21 -0400
Paul W. Abrahams wrote:
>
> It would be possible to solve this problem by extending the
> syntax of EntityDecl
> to allow the specification of an implicit prefix for an included
> DTD, but that
> would require integration of the Namespace spec into the XML
> spec. Personally I
> believe that would be a Good Thing, but it doesn't appear to be
> in the cards.
>
Actually XML names already redefine:
doctypedecl
elementdecl
cp
Mixed
AttlistDecl
AttDef
so I don't think that it didn't happen for a lack of desire to muck with XML
1.0.
Jonathan Borden
The Open Healthcare Group
http://www.openhealth.org
|
