[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 23:28:00 +0100 (BST)
Jonathan Borden wrote:
>Actually XML names already redefine:
>doctypedecl
>elementdecl
>[...]
No it doesn't. To conform to the namespaces spec a document must meet
certain extra constraints on these productions, but all
namespace-compliant documents are XML 1.0 documents and their XML 1.0
meaning is unchanged. On the other hand a change like:
> extending the syntax of EntityDecl
> to allow the specification of an implicit prefix for an included
> DTD
would change the XML 1.0 meaning of documents. In particular, it
would make documents valid that were otherwise invalid.
-- Richard
|
