OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   Re: Summary: xml:lang validity and RFC 1766 refs to outdated codes

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
  • To: Mike Brown <mbrown@corp.webb.net>, "xml-dev@xml.org" <xml-dev@xml.org>
  • Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2000 17:07:24 -0400

Mike Brown wrote:

> 3. Optionally enforced rules that are neither well-formedness nor validity
> constraints, but that satisfy certain intentions, so that document authors
> can produce "proper" XML. Rules of this type which are broken do not change
> a document's  XML 1.0 conformance status.
> The statement that xml:lang values are RFC 1766 (and successors) language
> identifiers falls under number 3. (correct?)

I think so, yes.


Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS