[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- To: Mike Brown <mbrown@corp.webb.net>, "xml-dev@xml.org" <xml-dev@xml.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2000 17:07:24 -0400
Mike Brown wrote:
> 3. Optionally enforced rules that are neither well-formedness nor validity
> constraints, but that satisfy certain intentions, so that document authors
> can produce "proper" XML. Rules of this type which are broken do not change
> a document's XML 1.0 conformance status.
>
> The statement that xml:lang values are RFC 1766 (and successors) language
> identifiers falls under number 3. (correct?)
I think so, yes.
--
Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
|
