Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: David Brownell <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2000 08:53:58 -0700
> In recognition of this fact, official erratum E73 (at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-19980210-errata#E73) removes these productions
> from XML 1.0 altogether. ...
> ... There is no validity constraint prescribing it.
Although it's certainly confusing that there WAS a validity
constraint for a while, and in fact that was the official
W3C story given to its members for over a year before it
was finally published as an erratum earlier this year.
I hope I'm not the only one who finds the W3C backtracking
to be a potential concern, with respect to stability of
the specifications on which we're building.
In effect, there was a VC for about 18 months, up to about
one month ago when E73 became public.