Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Francis Norton <email@example.com>
- To: Rick JELLIFFE <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 12:29:23 +0100
Rick JELLIFFE wrote:
> , but on the
> other hand the participants do have very definite use-cases that
> they do want to support, and which RELAX or Schematron do not.
Have these use cases been published? For me the key element of
difficulty reading the part 1 spec is that it appears to be a complex
solution that has been abstracted out from the a lot of the problems it
is designed to solve. Technical specs are like novels, understanding
motivations casts light on everything.
Defy Convention? Deify Convention!