Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <email@example.com>
- To: Michael Rossi <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 10:36:19 -0500
Unless one has the version attribute (and you do), then
considering it an identifier (a unique name) is dangerous
for fielding versioned applications, yes? IOW, it
becomes a managed entity to ensure local versions
are the versions to which the application was built.
Intergraph Public Safety
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Michael Rossi [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Given that the namespace spec only ever intended to "identify",
rather than "locate", I choose the latter interpretation. And based on this
interpretation, it seems to me that my namespace can remain constant across
versions of my spec (as a single instance can't contain more than one
version of it).