[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- To: Michael Rossi <mrossi@crusher.jcals.csc.com>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 10:36:19 -0500
Thanks Michael.
Unless one has the version attribute (and you do), then
considering it an identifier (a unique name) is dangerous
for fielding versioned applications, yes? IOW, it
becomes a managed entity to ensure local versions
are the versions to which the application was built.
Len Bullard
Intergraph Public Safety
clbullar@ingr.com
http://fly.hiwaay.net/~cbullard/lensongs.ram
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Rossi [mailto:mrossi@crusher.jcals.csc.com]
Given that the namespace spec only ever intended to "identify",
rather than "locate", I choose the latter interpretation. And based on this
interpretation, it seems to me that my namespace can remain constant across
versions of my spec (as a single instance can't contain more than one
version of it).
|