Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Murata Makoto <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 00:49:05 +0900
Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> RELAX takes, I think, a sugar-free approach of making you declare types
> to binding them to element names.
Actually, in RELAX, you can always swap two subordinates (except
interface elements) of modules, and you are guaranteed to get the
same result. That is, the physical order of subordinates of modules
is not important.
>But this results in very shallow trees
> and therefore
> more cross-referencing: