[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: nchen <nchen@webmethods.com>
- To: "'Henry S. Thompson'" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 16:08:18 -0400
>this in turn is defined as equality of name.
Types can be anonymous! How can we prove two types are the same if they
don't have names? Do I miss something from the specs?
Ninggang
-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-xml-schema-ig-request@w3.org
[mailto:w3c-xml-schema-ig-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Henry S. Thompson
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 4:25 PM
To: nchen@webMethods.com
Cc: 'Martin Bryan'; xml-dev@lists.xml.org; w3c-xml-schema-ig@w3.org
Subject: Re: XML Schemas: ref'ing vs inlining
I'm in a rush so I can't find the reference, but equality of types is
subsumed under equality of components, and this in turn is defined as
equality of name.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
|
