OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   RE: XML Schemas: ref'ing vs inlining

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]
  • From: nchen <nchen@webmethods.com>
  • To: "'Henry S. Thompson'" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
  • Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 16:08:18 -0400

>this in turn is defined as equality of name.

Types can be anonymous! How can we prove two types are the same if they
don't have names? Do I miss something from the specs?

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-xml-schema-ig-request@w3.org
[mailto:w3c-xml-schema-ig-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Henry S. Thompson
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 4:25 PM
To: nchen@webMethods.com
Cc: 'Martin Bryan'; xml-dev@lists.xml.org; w3c-xml-schema-ig@w3.org
Subject: Re: XML Schemas: ref'ing vs inlining

I'm in a rush so I can't find the reference, but equality of types is
subsumed under equality of components, and this in turn is defined as
equality of name.

  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS