[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "William D. Lindsey" <bill@blnz.com>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 11:13:37 -0800
"Hanson, Jon" wrote:
>
> then such expressions would not be valid xml, so you can't really write a
> DTD for them.
> an XML equivalent of what you appear to be attempting might be something
> like:-
>
> <lambda>
> <name>fred</name>
> <body>xyz</body>
> </lambda>
If you're trying to express a DTD-constrained lisp grammar in XML,
that's probably the approach to take.
SGML, by virtue of its configurable concrete syntax, lets you get
a bit closer to the original lisp syntax.
I would never recommend that anybody actually use this for anything,
but you can find a toy example of lisp-in-SGML at:
http://www.blnz.com/lml/
Enjoy,
Bill
|
