[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Dan Vint <dvint@slip.net>
- To: lee.pollington@biomednet.com ("Pollington, Lee (ELSLON)")
- Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 07:16:17 -0800 (PST)
>
> I am intending to role out Arbortext Epic LE to a group of journalists and
> editors. It's cheap and simple, but the interface is still quite intuitive:
> tab to the next element, return gives a context menu of tags that can be
> used in that context.
>
> The only problem I have with any of these editors is that none of them
> support XSLT or even standard CSS for the styling, some have preview modes;
> I'm thinking of XMetal, but I believe you are tied into MSXML then (urgh).
> Epic uses FOSI for styling.
XMetaL has a version of James Clark's XT wrapped in a DLL that can be used. In
version 2 of this product you have to find it in the support directory to
install it where previous versions it was a little more noticable to install
it.
Yes their default is to use MS, but this approach shows a method for
incorporating any XSLT processor that you wanted to use:
1) Wrap the parser in a DLL if it doesn't have one.
2) Write the macro script that links the parser into the XMetaL
environment.
..dan
>
> Lee
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Lugt [mailto:roblugt@elcel.com]
> Sent: 22 November 2000 10:52
> To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: XML Editor recommendation?
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> We have a client which is a small group of journalists wishing
> to create XML
> content. They are not used to using mark-up languages and
> they currently
> use MS Word for their documents. They need a user-friendly editor that
> takes the hard work our of creating XML files.
>
> The editor doesn't have to be free, but it does have to be aimed at the
> general population (not programmers!).
> Something like MS XMLNotepad doesn't cut it.
>
> I'm sure some of you will have been in a similar situation.
> If so, would
> you mind sharing your recommendation?
>
> Regards
> Rob Lugt
> ElCel Technology
>
>
|