[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- To: "Gregory M. Messner" <greg.messner@breezefactor.com>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 14:52:20 -0600
Yes. It may be perverse if names have names have names but legal.
This is how MIL-n-87269 did system/susbsystem trees for
interactive tech manuals. We did at one point go into
the SGML Declaration and limit the recursion depth.
Actually, there is a case where you see names with names
in the public safety industry: Also Known As (AKA) aliases.
It can be represented as a recursion or as an involvement (XLink).
Len
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
-----Original Message-----
From: Gregory M. Messner [mailto:greg.messner@breezefactor.com]
Is the following content model valid? Notice "Name" being the element and a
particle in the content model.
<!ELEMENT Name (#PCDATA | Name)*>
|
