Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Dave Winer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Uche Ogbuji <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 08:36:33 -0800
Just something to think about..
You may have found a bug in RDF. If it can't be represented in common
programming and scripting environments it's going to have a pretty high
barrier to adoption.
The serialization formats in XML-RPC and SOAP have been proven to work
across many different environments.
Surely you can model a directed graph in a Java or Perl structure?
If so, then you can use XML-RPC or SOAP serialization.
If not, what's the future of RDF??
----- Original Message -----
From: "Uche Ogbuji" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "Dave Winer" <email@example.com>
Cc: "xml-dev" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: Academia needed the Web (Re: Success factors for the
> > If that's what RDF is going to be used for I'd strongly recommend using
> > serialization format in XML-RPC or SOAP. They both work incredibly well,
> > are supported in lots of environments and are understandable, very
> > stuff that allows data structures to be exchanged between apps on all
> > platforms. Something to think about? Dave
> Say what?
> RDF is a directed graph. There is _nothing_ to compare between RDF and
> foo serialization format. RDF could be serialized to foo serialization
> format or foo serialization format could maybe represented by an RDF
> but they are orthogonal technologies.
> How on earth is SOAP serialization going to represent annotated
> relationships? You're not seriously suggesting that nonsense with
> multi-reference values, are you? Even that is more than XML-RPC has to
> offer for relationships.
> Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant
> email@example.com +1 303 583 9900 x 101
> Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com
> 4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA
> Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python