Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Danny Ayers <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Mike Brown <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 13:34:45 +0600
I've just had a quick glance - looks really useful, thanks.
I amused by the irony of a rant being saved as Word HTML though - worthy of
a rant in itself! Looking at the source though it does look like they've
improved things considerably - there's even a ns ref to the HTML 4 rec.
Maybe the tool in Dreamweaver specifically for sorting out Word HTML is no
longer needed. I wonder though if it will display properly on Netscape...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Brown [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: 29 December 2000 12:49
> To: 'firstname.lastname@example.org'
> Subject: XML vs HTTP
> I have written a little rant^H^H^H^H^H white paper to inform my fellow
> developers about the risks inherent in HTTP transmissions of XML,
> when processing an XML document as if it were (or as) an HTML form data
> It is surely not perfect, so I would appreciate some peer review. Please
> have a look at http://skew.org/xml/misc/xml_vs_http/ and address
> comments to
> me directly so I can correct the defects without too much public
> Also, apologies for the HTML in the document, if it causes
> problems; it was
> saved directly from MS Word, in great haste.
> Thank you,
> - Mike
> Mike J. Brown, software engineer at My XML/XSL resources:
> webb.net in Denver, Colorado, USA http://skew.org/xml/