Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Ken MacLeod <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 10:09:02 -0600
"Sean B. Palmer" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Simple question:-
> <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
> It has often been siad that the most useful characteristic of having
> a unique name for XML is simply that it is therfore unique. The
> above example is an XHTML div element. But how do we know it is
> For the record: I think that an HTML processor could jsut
> "recognize" the xmlns. An XML processor would just say "well, it's
> unique", and an SW engine would try to dereference it.
Right. At this stage, since there is no (general) spec that ties a NS
to any other semantic information, the attachment of semantic
information is done "out of band".
Every XML application I've seen or written that uses namespaces to
derive semantics has a copy of the namespace URI so that when it sees
that URI in an instance it can go, "ah, I know what that is".
I think the meat of this whole debate surrounds "where is the spec
that ties a NS to other semantic information", and then only
collaterally what issues would be involved in doing so.