Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• Re: Why not reinvent the wheel?, Charles Reitzel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why not reinvent the wheel?, Jonathan Robie
  • Re: Why not reinvent the wheel?, Jonathan Robie
    • What Ordering Does XQuery Need? (was:Re: Why not reinvent the wheel?), Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: What Ordering Does XQuery Need? (was:Re: Why not reinvent thewheel?), Jonathan Robie
    • Re: Why not reinvent the wheel?, Vasileios Papadimos
      • Re: Why not reinvent the wheel?, Jonathan Robie
      • Re: Why not reinvent the wheel?, Jonathan Robie
      • Re: Why not reinvent the wheel?, Joe English
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why not reinvent the wheel?, Vasileios Papadimos
• Re: SAX-ext Attribute + Entity Parsing, Charles Reitzel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: SAX-ext Attribute + Entity Parsing, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Partial Validation by DTD, Levy, Eliezer
  • Re: Partial Validation by DTD, Jeff Rafter
• Re: Is whitespace within general entities ignorable?, Christopher R. Maden
• XML tools, in particular canonicalization and DSIG, in C++; plus,security overviews/tutorial, Amir Herzberg
• more grist, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: more grist, Ben Trafford
    • RE: more grist, Leigh Dodds
      • PSVI, Tim Bray
      • Re: PSVI, Jonathan Borden
      • RE: PSVI, Leigh Dodds
      • re: PSVI, David Megginson
      • re: PSVI, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: PSVI, Jonathan Borden
      • re: PSVI, David Megginson
      • re: PSVI, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: PSVI, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: PSVI, John Cowan
      • Re: PSVI, Henry S. Thompson
      • re: PSVI, Sean McGrath
      • Re: PSVI, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: PSVI, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: PSVI, Marcus Carr
      • Re: PSVI, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: PSVI, Marcus Carr
      • Re: more grist, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: more grist, Eric van der Vlist
      • Homework assignment was: Re: more grist, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Homework assignment was: Re: more grist, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: more grist, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: more grist, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: more grist, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: more grist, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: more grist, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: more grist, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: more grist, James Clark
      • Re: more grist, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: more grist, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: more grist, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: more grist, Henry S. Thompson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: more grist, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: more grist, Ben Trafford
      • Re: more grist, John Cowan
      • Re: more grist, Ben Trafford
      • Re: more grist, Henry S. Thompson
    • RE: more grist, Leigh Dodds
    • Re: more grist, John Cowan
  • RE: more grist, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: more grist, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: more grist, Vegt, Jan
  • RE: more grist, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: more grist, Vegt, Jan
  • RE: more grist, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: more grist, Rick Jelliffe
    • 100's of old Posts Today, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: 100's of old Posts Today, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: 100's of old Posts Today, david barnes
      • Re: 100's of old Posts Today, Dipankar Chakrabarti
• RELAX will continue in ISO (was Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices), Murata Makoto
• FWD: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Uche Ogbuji
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Evan Lenz
  • RE: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Uche Ogbuji
  • RE: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Clark C. Evans
      • Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Steve Muench
      • Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Clark C. Evans
      • Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Steve Muench
      • Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Clark C. Evans
      • Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Steve Muench
      • Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Clark C. Evans
      • Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Steve Muench
      • Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Clark C. Evans
      • Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Francis Norton
      • Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Francis Norton
      • Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Robin Berjon
      • Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Steve Muench
      • Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Robin Berjon
      • Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Steve Muench
      • Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Robin Berjon
      • Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Steve Muench
      • Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Clark C. Evans
      • Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Robin Berjon
      • Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Clark C. Evans
      • Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Robin Berjon
    • RE: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Evan Lenz
  • RE: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Robin Berjon
  • RE: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Clark C. Evans
    • RE: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Evan Lenz
  • RE: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Wedinger, Keith
  • RE: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Don Park
      • RE: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Evan Lenz
  • Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Charles Reitzel
    • Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Robin Berjon
  • Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Charles Reitzel
    • Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Robin Berjon
      • Message not available
      • Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Robin Berjon
  • Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1, Charles Reitzel
• [Fwd: Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT1.1], Uche Ogbuji
• RE: Homework assignment was: Re: more grist, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Homework assignment was: Re: more grist, Jonathan Borden
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Homework assignment was: Re: more grist, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Homework assignment was: Re: more grist, Jonathan Borden
• Re: XQuery: is FLWR a <xsl:foreach/> ?, Jonathan Robie
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XQuery: is FLWR a <xsl:foreach/> ?, Charles Reitzel
• Re: Reinventing the wheel (an implementor point of view), Jonathan Robie
• RE: XQuery - The truth comes out!, Jonathan Robie
• Re: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Jonathan Robie
• To Buy, or to Build? That is the q..., Allen Chang
  • Re: To Buy, or to Build? That is the q..., Christian Nentwich
  • Re: To Buy, or to Build? That is the q..., Francis Norton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: To Buy, or to Build? That is the q..., Wedinger, Keith
  • RE: To Buy, or to Build? That is the q..., Wedinger, Keith
    • Re: To Buy, or to Build? That is the q..., Jeff Rafter
• XML Ain't What It Used To Be, Wedinger, Keith
  • Re: XML Ain't What It Used To Be, Joe English
• A real community service, Tim Bray
  • Re: A real community service, Ben Trafford
    • Message not available
      • Re: A real community service, Edd Dumbill
  • RE: A real community service, Michael Fitzgerald
    • RE: A real community service, Jonathan Borden
      • RE: A real community service, Michael Fitzgerald
  • RE: A real community service, Lynda VanVleet
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: A real community service, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: A real community service, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: A real community service, david barnes
    • Re: A real community service, Marcus Carr
  • RE: A real community service, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Some enhancements to Jaws, Singla, Vinay
• Since XML.Com is unbiased, Dave Winer
  • Re: Since XML.Com is unbiased, Matt Sergeant
    • RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9*, David Megginson
      • Re: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9*, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9*, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9*, David Megginson
      • Re: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9*, David Megginson
      • Re: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9*, Dave Winer
      • Re: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9*, Matt Sergeant
      • Re: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9*, David Megginson
      • Re: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9*, Dave Winer
      • Re: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9*, Aaron Swartz
• Re: Abbreviated Tag Names (ASN.1), Francis Norton
• XML Stylesheet Tool needed, Sharon Knowles
  • RE: XML Stylesheet Tool needed, Christopher Parkerson
• MSXML: New document built has only one line., christine.coisy
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: MSXML: New document built has only one line., Wedinger, Keith
  • FW: MSXML: New document built has only one line., Wedinger, Keith
  • RE: MSXML: New document built has only one line., Dan Rogers
• XML Meta-Architecture (Technetcast program of Henry Thompson keynote), Ken North
  • Re: XML Meta-Architecture (Technetcast program of Henry Thompsonkeynote), Philippe Lourier
• RE: PSVI, HUGHES,MARK (Non-HP-FtCollins,ex1)
  • Re: PSVI, Justin Couch
    • Re: PSVI, Sean McGrath
      • Re: PSVI, Justin Couch
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: PSVI, Uche Ogbuji
    • Re: PSVI, Henry S. Thompson
  • Re: PSVI, Charles Reitzel
  • Re: PSVI, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: PSVI, Henry S. Thompson
  • Re: PSVI, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: PSVI, Henry S. Thompson
  • PSVI, James Robertson
    • RE: PSVI, Evan Lenz
    • Re: PSVI, Ken North
      • RE: A real community service, Marcus Carr
      • Re: SQLX public meeting (April 10, New York), Ken North
      • IBM developerWorks: two new audio programs about XML, Web Services, Ken North
  • RE: PSVI, Michael Brennan
  • Re: PSVI, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: PSVI, Ronald Bourret
      • Re: PSVI, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: PSVI, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: PSVI, Simon St.Laurent
• RE: XML Meta-Architecture (Technetcast program of Henry Thompsonkeynote), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: XML Meta-Architecture (Technetcast program of Henry Thompsonkeynote), Henry S. Thompson
• Binding XSLT script functions to implementation (was ANNOUNCE: Petition...), Arnold, Curt
• is that a fork in the road?, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: is that a fork in the road?, Eric van der Vlist
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: is that a fork in the road?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: is that a fork in the road?, Henry S. Thompson
  • RE: is that a fork in the road?, Mike.Champion
  • RE: is that a fork in the road?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: is that a fork in the road?, Eric van der Vlist
    • RE: is that a fork in the road?, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: is that a fork in the road?, Eric van der Vlist
    • Re: is that a fork in the road?, Ken North
      • Call for participation for XML DevCon Fall 2001, SQL Summit,Web Servies Summit (October 29-November 1), Ken North
    • Re: is that a fork in the road?, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: is that a fork in the road?, Richard Lanyon
  • RE: is that a fork in the road?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: is that a fork in the road?, Sean McGrath
  • RE: is that a fork in the road?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: is that a fork in the road?, Simon St.Laurent
    • RE: is that a fork in the road?, Tim Bray
  • RE: is that a fork in the road?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: is that a fork in the road?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: is that a fork in the road?, Marcus Carr
      • Re: is that a fork in the road?, Tim Bray
      • Re: is that a fork in the road?, Marcus Carr
      • Re: is that a fork in the road?, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: is that a fork in the road?, James Robertson
      • Re: is that a fork in the road?, Paul T
      • XP and fruit-picking (was Re: is that a fork in the road?), David Megginson
      • Re: XP and fruit-picking (was Re: is that a fork in the road?), Marcus Carr
  • RE: is that a fork in the road?, Mike.Champion
    • RE: is that a fork in the road?, Michael Fitzgerald
  • RE: is that a fork in the road?, HUGHES,MARK (Non-HP-FtCollins,ex1)
  • RE: is that a fork in the road?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: is that a fork in the road?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: is that a fork in the road?, Sean McGrath
      • Re: is that a fork in the road?, W. E. Perry
  • RE: is that a fork in the road?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: is that a fork in the road?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: is that a fork in the road?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: is that a fork in the road?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: is that a fork in the road?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: is that a fork in the road?, HUGHES,MARK (Non-HP-FtCollins,ex1)
  • RE: is that a fork in the road?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: New W3C XML Schema facet ? [was: RDDL Schematron Schema], Henry S. Thompson
• Re: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?, Henry S. Thompson
  • Re: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?, Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI
    • Re: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?, Henry S. Thompson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?, Murata Makoto
• Re: Blowout, Henry S. Thompson
  • Re: Blowout, Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI
  • Message not available
    • Re: Blowout, Joe English
      • Re: Blowout, Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI
  • Re: Blowout, Murata Makoto
  • The devil is always in the detail..., Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI
• Coordination of <script> between SVG, XSLT 1.1 and HTML 4.01, Arnold, Curt
  • Re: Coordination of <script> between SVG, XSLT 1.1 and HTML 4.01, Clark C. Evans
  • Re: Coordination of <script> between SVG, XSLT 1.1 and HTML 4.01, Clark C. Evans
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Coordination of <script> between SVG, XSLT 1.1 and HTML 4.01, Arnold, Curt
• Concatenating Elements, S. Jyotinarayan
  • Re: Concatenating Elements, Francis Norton
• xlinkit: link generation and consistency checking, Christian Nentwich
• About Infosets, Didier PH Martin
  • Re: About Infosets, Sean McGrath
    • RE: About Infosets, Didier PH Martin
      • Re: About Infosets, W. E. Perry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: About Infosets, Mike.Champion
• RDDL & WSDL, Simon Fell
• Re: Give 'em some rope (was [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdrawxsl:script from XSLT 1.1), Charles Reitzel
• We need an XPath API, Charles Reitzel
  • Re: We need an XPath API, Eric van der Vlist
  • Re: We need an XPath API, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: We need an XPath API, Robin Berjon
    • Re: We need an XPath API, Sean McGrath
      • Re: We need an XPath API, Robin Berjon
      • Re: We need an XPath API, Eric van der Vlist
  • Re: We need an XPath API, Robin Berjon
  • Re: We need an XPath API, Thomas B. Passin
  • re: We need an XPath API, David Megginson
    • re: We need an XPath API, Robin Berjon
  • Re: We need an XPath API, Christian Nentwich
    • Re: We need an XPath API, W. E. Perry
      • Re: We need an XPath API, Christian Nentwich
      • Re: We need an XPath API, W. E. Perry
    • Re: We need an XPath API, Eric van der Vlist
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: We need an XPath API, Mike.Champion
    • RE: We need an XPath API, Robin Berjon
      • RE: We need an XPath API, Didier PH Martin
      • RE: We need an XPath API, Robin Berjon
  • RE: We need an XPath API, Mike.Champion
  • Re: We need an XPath API, Charles Reitzel
    • Re: We need an XPath API, Thomas B. Passin
      • Message not available
      • Re: We need an XPath API, Thomas B. Passin
  • Re: We need an XPath API, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: We need an XPath API, Robin Berjon
    • Re: We need an XPath API, Christian Nentwich
  • Re: We need an XPath API, Terje Norderhaug
    • Re: We need an XPath API, Christian Nentwich
  • Re: We need an XPath API, Eric Bohlman
  • Re: We need an XPath API, Charles Reitzel
  • Re: We need an XPath API, Charles Reitzel
    • RE: We need an XPath API, Evan Lenz
  • Re: We need an XPath API, Charles Reitzel
  • Re: We need an XPath API, Charles Reitzel
  • Re: We need an XPath API, Paul Grosso
    • Re: We need an XPath API, Charles Reitzel
  • Re: We need an XPath API, Charles Reitzel
• XML does not work with Netscape, S. Jyotinarayan
  • Re: XML does not work with Netscape, Mike Brown
    • RE: XML does not work with Netscape, Michael Fitzgerald
      • Re: XML does not work with Netscape, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: XML does not work with Netscape, Matt Sergeant
      • Re: XML does not work with Netscape, Thomas B. Passin
• Best way to parse XML data and display in on a browser, S. Jyotinarayan
  • Re: Best way to parse XML data and display in on a browser, Matt Sergeant
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Best way to parse XML data and display in on a browser, S. Jyotinarayan
• Displaying data node by node, S. Jyotinarayan
• Re: fixed attributes in Schemas, Jeff Rafter
• Re: Restriction in XML Schema, Henry S. Thompson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Restriction in XML Schema, Jay Zhang
    • Re: Restriction in XML Schema, Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Identity-constraint, Henry S. Thompson
  • Re: Identity-constraint, Eddie Robertsson
• Re: The relentless march of abstraction (fwd), Henry S. Thompson
• Fw: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9*, Dave Winer
  • Re: Fw: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9*, Matt Sergeant
    • Re: Fw: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9*, Dave Winer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9*, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• TRAX API - where?, Mike Brown
  • Re: TRAX API - where?, Robin Berjon
    • Re: TRAX API - where?, Steve Muench
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Jeff Rafter
  • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Jeff Rafter
    • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Jeff Rafter
  • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
    • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Christian Nentwich
  • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Eddie Robertsson
  • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
  • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
  • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
• XML Schema, Kamran Khan
  • Re: XML Schema, Henry S. Thompson
• [RDDL] new specification 20010305, Jonathan Borden
• [RDDL] RDDLClassLoader, Jonathan Borden
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [RDDL] RDDLClassLoader, Arnold, Curt
    • RE: [RDDL] RDDLClassLoader, Jonathan Borden
  • RE: [RDDL] RDDLClassLoader, Arnold, Curt
  • [RDDL] RDDLClassLoader, Jonathan Borden
• Visual XML Schema Mapper, Mullin Yu
• biztalk schema, Nick Laqua
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: biztalk schema, Nick Laqua
• XQuery - Why is the Charter secret?, AndrewWatt2000
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XQuery - Why is the Charter secret?, Jonathan Robie
    • Message not available
      • Re: XQuery - Why is the Charter secret?, Edd Dumbill
  • Re: XQuery - Why is the Charter secret?, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: XQuery - Why is the Charter secret?, AndrewWatt2000
• Simon and Simon (Simon St. Laurent and Herbert Simon), Mike.Champion
• RE: XP and fruit-picking (was Re: is that a fork in the road?), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XP and fruit-picking (was Re: is that a fork in the road?), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [ANN] DeltaXML: XML file comparisons and change control, Robin LaFontaine
• RFC: A Little IDL, Dave Winer
• Reminder: XML DevCon 2001 (New York, April 8-11), Ken North
• looking for xml aware products, Adam Van Den Hoven
• painting types, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: painting types, Joe English
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: painting types, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • re: painting types, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: painting types, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: painting types, Jonathan Borden
  • RE: painting types, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: painting types, Jonathan Borden
• Moles and Holes (WAS RE: is that a fork in the road?), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Alternatives to XML Schemas, Rick Jelliffe
  • Architecture (was Re: Alternatives to XML Schemas), Simon St.Laurent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Alternatives to XML Schemas, Michael Brennan
  • RE: Alternatives to XML Schemas, Wedinger, Keith
    • Re: Alternatives to XML Schemas, Jeff Rafter
  • RE: Alternatives to XML Schemas, Michael Brennan
    • Re: Alternatives to XML Schemas, Eddie Robertsson
      • Re: Alternatives to XML Schemas, Ronald Bourret
    • Re: Alternatives to XML Schemas, Ronald Bourret
  • RE: Alternatives to XML Schemas, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Alternatives to XML Schemas, Rick Jelliffe
    • SAX TypeHandler was: Alternatives to XML Schemas, Jonathan Borden
  • RE: Alternatives to XML Schemas, Michael Brennan
  • RE: Alternatives to XML Schemas, Michael Brennan
• new OASIS discussion list: HumanML, Karl Best
• [Announce] XML Database Discussion List, Kimbro Staken
• XSet: an update, Jonathan Borden
• What is an XPath API?, Martin v. Loewis
  • Re: What is an XPath API?, Matt Sergeant
• Output Indenting with XSL, Tigran Hayrapetyan
  • RE: Output Indenting with XSL, David Santamauro
    • Re: Output Indenting with XSL, Mike Brown
  • Re: Output Indenting with XSL, Jirka Kosek
• Mapping W3C schemas to object schemas to relational schemas, Ronald Bourret
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Mapping W3C schemas to object schemas to relational schemas, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• PyTREX 0.5.0 released, James Tauber
• Re: <xinclude> & unimplementable specs, Richard Tobin
• XML second edition question: E29, Staffan Måhlén
• [ANN] last call for reviews of PRISM metadata spec, Ron Daniel
• 37 SOAP 1.1 implementations, Dave Winer
  • Message not available
    • Re: 37 SOAP 1.1 implementations, Edd Dumbill
      • Re: 37 SOAP 1.1 implementations, Eduardo Gutentag
      • Message not available
      • Re: 37 SOAP 1.1 implementations, Edd Dumbill
      • Re: 37 SOAP 1.1 implementations, Dave Winer
  • RE: 37 SOAP 1.1 implementations, Tom McCann
• RE: XP and fruit-picking, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• URIs and information typing, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: URIs and information typing, Jonathan Borden
    • Re: URIs and information typing, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: URIs and information typing, Eric van der Vlist
      • RE: URIs and information typing, Jonathan Borden
    • Re: URIs and information typing, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: URIs and information typing, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: URIs and information typing, W. E. Perry
      • Re: URIs and information typing, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: URIs and information typing, Henry S. Thompson
    • Re: URIs and information typing, Simon St.Laurent
    • RE: URIs and information typing, Jonathan Borden
• [Fwd: XML Schema Implementation of Dublin Core], Roger L. Costello
• an xsl/xpath question re attribute qualifiers, james anderson
  • Re: an xsl/xpath question re attribute qualifiers, David Carlisle
    • Re: an xsl/xpath question re attribute qualifiers, james anderson
• an xslt question re modeling namespaces, james anderson
  • Re: an xslt question re modeling namespaces, David Carlisle
    • Re: an xslt question re modeling namespaces, james anderson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • re: an xslt question re modeling namespaces, james anderson
• XML Schema built-in data type namespace URI., KAZUMI Saito
  • Re: XML Schema built-in data type namespace URI., Eddie Robertsson
  • Re: XML Schema built-in data type namespace URI., Henry S. Thompson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML Schema built-in data type namespace URI., Biron,Paul V
    • Re: XML Schema built-in data type namespace URI., Jonathan Borden
      • Re: XML Schema built-in data type namespace URI., Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: XML Schema built-in data type namespace URI., Jonathan Borden
      • RDDL for names (was Re: XML Schema built-in data type namespace URI.), Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: RDDL for names (was Re: XML Schema built-in data type namespaceURI.), W. E. Perry
      • RE: RDDL for names (was Re: XML Schema built-in data typenamespaceURI.), Jonathan Borden
      • Re: RDDL for names (was Re: XML Schema built-in data type namespaceURI.), Eric van der Vlist
      • RE: RDDL for names (was Re: XML Schema built-in data typenamespaceURI.), Jonathan Borden
      • Message not available
      • IMHORe: Can XPointers be used as a name (was Re: RDDL for names ? (wasRe: XMLSchema built-in data typenamespaceURI.)), Jonathan Borden
      • Re: IMHORe: Can XPointers be used as a name (was Re: RDDL for names ?(was Re: XMLSchema built-in data typenamespaceURI.)), Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: Can XPointers be used as a name (was Re: RDDL for names ?(was Re:XMLSchema built-in data typenamespaceURI.)), Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Can XPointers be used as a name (was Re: RDDL for names ?(was Re:XMLSchema built-in data typenamespaceURI.)), Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: Can XPointers be used as a name (was Re: RDDL for names ?(was Re:XMLSchema built-in data typenamespaceURI.)), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Can XPointers be used as a name (was Re: RDDL for names ?(was Re:XMLSchema built-in data typenamespaceURI.)), Charles Reitzel
      • RE: Can XPointers be used as a name (was Re: RDDL for names ?(wasRe:XMLSchema built-in data typenamespaceURI.)), Jonathan Borden
      • Re: XML Schema built-in data type namespace URI, Charles Reitzel
      • The less abstract Infoset, Jeff Rafter
      • RE: The less abstract Infoset, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: The less abstract Infoset, Jeff Rafter
      • RE: The less abstract Infoset, Jonathan Borden
      • RE: RDDL for names (was Re: XML Schema built-in data type namespaceURI.), Jonathan Borden
      • Re: XML Schema built-in data type namespace URI., W. E. Perry
    • RE: XML Schema built-in data type namespace URI., Charles Reitzel
• an xpath/xsl question: why must arguments be path expressions?, james anderson
  • Re: an xpath/xsl question: why must arguments be path expressions?, David Carlisle
    • Re: an xpath/xsl question: why must (a QName in an) argument be a pathexpression?, james anderson
      • Re: an xpath/xsl question: why must (a QName in an) argument be a pathexpression?, Matt Sergeant
      • Re: an xpath/xsl question: why must (a QName in an) argument be a pathexpression?, David Carlisle
      • Re: an xpath/xsl question: why must (a QName in an) argument be apathexpression?, james anderson
      • Re: an xpath/xsl question: why must (a QName in an) argument be apathexpression?, David Carlisle
  • Re: an xpath/xsl question: why must arguments be path expressions?, Christopher R. Maden
• How Big is XML?, Alexander Alexeev
• RDDL and MIME types, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: RDDL and MIME types, Jonathan Borden
• Universal eBusiness XML Standard?, Wedinger, Keith
• Looking for help with MSXML CAB, Adam Van Den Hoven
• DTD Entity, Richard Knapp
  • Re: DTD Entity, Charles Reitzel
    • Re: DTD Entity, Danny Vint
    • Re: DTD Entity, Richard Knapp
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: DTD Entity, jcowan
  • Re: DTD Entity, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: DTD Entity, Rick Jelliffe
• RE: XML DOM Object size limitations, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XML DOM Object size limitations, Christian Nentwich
  • RE: XML DOM Object size limitations, Bruce ONeel
• RE: Textual transmission typically faster?, Gavin Thomas Nicol
• RE: Abbreviated Tag Names, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • RE: Abbreviated Tag Names, Don Park
• RE: The less abstract Infoset, Paul Grosso
• Ruby scripting, XML, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: Ruby scripting, XML, Dave Winer
    • Re: Ruby scripting, XML, Simon St.Laurent
• Re: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema, Christian Nentwich
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema, Nicholas Raphael
    • Re: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema, Dave Carlson
• Reincidence at xml-dev, jackson
• What the heck???!!! Old mail showing up, Hal DeVore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: What the heck???!!! Old mail showing up, Bill
    • Re: What the heck???!!! Old mail showing up, Thomas B. Passin
• A Call for Dialogue on XML Schema Part 1 and 2, Don Park
  • Re: A Call for Dialogue on XML Schema Part 1 and 2, Clark C. Evans
    • RE: A Call for Dialogue on XML Schema Part 1 and 2, David E. Cleary
  • Re: A Call for Dialogue on XML Schema Part 1 and 2, Eric van der Vlist
    • RE: A Call for Dialogue on XML Schema Part 1 and 2, David E. Cleary
      • RE: A Call for Dialogue on XML Schema Part 1 and 2, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: A Call for Dialogue on XML Schema Part 1 and 2, Eric van der Vlist
      • RE: A Call for Dialogue on XML Schema Part 1 and 2, David E. Cleary
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A Call for Dialogue on XML Schema Part 1 and 2, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: A Call for Dialogue on XML Schema Part 1 and 2, Charles Reitzel
• DTD declaration, Richard Knapp
  • Re: DTD declaration, Mike Brown
    • Re: DTD declaration, Richard Knapp
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: DTD declaration, Paul Grosso
    • Re: DTD declaration, Mike Brown
    • Re: DTD declaration, John Halleck
• Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Henry S. Thompson
  • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, James Clark
    • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Henry S. Thompson
      • Personal reply to Henry S. Thompson, Don Park
    • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, W. E. Perry
      • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Eric van der Vlist
    • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, David E. Cleary
      • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XMLSchema, David E. Cleary
      • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Simon St.Laurent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Eric van der Vlist
  • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Rick Jelliffe
• schema : what's the problem, Christian Nentwich
• Handler for xml declaration, Jenny Lam
  • binary data in XML, Argo Priivits
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Handler for xml declaration, Jenny Lam
    • Re: Handler for xml declaration, Charles Reitzel
• Re: SAX InputSource and character streams, David Megginson
  • Re: SAX InputSource and character streams, John Cowan
  • Re: SAX InputSource and character streams, Rob Lugt
  • Re: SAX InputSource and character streams, Mike Brown
• RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Matthew Gertner
    • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, W. E. Perry
      • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Sean McGrath
      • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Gavin Thomas Nicol
    • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Matthew Gertner
    • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XMLSchema, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Clark C. Evans
      • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • A bit of pedantry (was Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML HackArticle. . .), W. E. Perry
      • Re: A bit of pedantry (was Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XMLHackArticle. . .), Eric van der Vlist
      • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Charles Reitzel
      • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Martin v. Loewis
      • why XML? (was Re: Personal reply), Simon St.Laurent
    • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, W. E. Perry
    • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Matthew Gertner
    • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, W. E. Perry
    • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Robert C. Lyons
      • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, David E. Cleary
      • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Robert C. Lyons
    • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, David E. Cleary
      • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Thomas B. Passin
      • tolerating anarchy (was Re: Personal reply), Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: tolerating anarchy (was Re: Personal reply), Danny Ayers
    • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, W. E. Perry
    • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Simon St.Laurent
    • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, David E. Cleary
      • typing (was RE: Personal reply), Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: typing (was RE: Personal reply), David E. Cleary
      • RE: typing (was RE: Personal reply), Simon St.Laurent
      • DTD as entity in anther DTD, hxzhang
      • Re: DTD as entity in anther DTD, Rob Lugt
      • Re: typing (was RE: Personal reply), Jeff Rafter
      • Re: typing (was RE: Personal reply), Sean McGrath
      • RE: typing, Jonathan Borden
      • RE: typing, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: typing, Thomas B. Passin
      • RE: typing, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Masters (was RE: Personal reply), Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: Masters (was RE: Personal reply), Gavin Thomas Nicol
    • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema, Rick Jelliffe
• Divide-and-validate: RELAX Namespace, Murata Makoto
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Divide-and-validate: RELAX Namespace, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Divide-and-validate: RELAX Namespace, Murata Makoto
• Of interest perhaps, Dave Winer
• RE: SyncML is kind of interesting, Didier PH Martin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: SyncML is kind of interesting, serge
    • RE: SyncML is kind of interesting, Didier PH Martin
    • Re: SyncML is kind of interesting, Justin Couch
• Open the window and close the door, Eric van der Vlist
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Open the window and close the door, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Masters (was RE: Personal reply), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• MSL and W3C XML Schema, Jonathan Robie
• Phases ( was Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrtW3C XML Schema), Rick Jelliffe
• sending & receiving xml in c++, Howard.Kidd
  • RE: sending & receiving xml in c++, John F. Schlesinger
• How to execute a perl script in Java?, Giota Karadimitriou
  • Re: How to execute a perl script in Java?, Matt Sergeant
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: How to execute a perl script in Java?, Giota Karadimitriou
    • RE: How to execute a perl script in Java?, Robin Berjon
    • Re: How to execute a perl script in Java?, Thomas B. Passin
• XLink processor, Gerd Mueller
  • Re: XLink processor, Christian Nentwich
  • Re: XLink processor, Simon St.Laurent
• RE: typing, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: typing, Jonathan Borden
  • Re: typing, Jonathan Borden
  • Re: typing, Jonathan Borden
  • Re: typing, Jonathan Borden
  • Re: typing, Jonathan Borden
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: typing, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: typing, Jonathan Borden
    • Re: typing, Jonathan Borden
  • RE: typing, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Datatypes vs anarchy (was Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML HackArticle wrt W3C XML Schema), Michael Champion
  • RE: Datatypes vs anarchy (was Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XMLHack Article wrt W3C XML Schema), David E. Cleary
    • RE: Datatypes vs anarchy (was Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XMLHack Article wrt W3C XML Schema), Ann Navarro
• What is "server-safe HTTP"?, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: What is "server-safe HTTP"?, Simon St.Laurent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: What is "server-safe HTTP"?, Charlie Kaiman
  • RE: What is "server-safe HTTP"?, Michael Brennan
• RE: Datatypes vs anarchy (was Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XMLHack Article wrt W3C XML Schema), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • PSVI in the Infoset Spec. (Re: Datatypes vs anarchy), Jeff Rafter
    • Relative Namespaces, Jeff Rafter
      • Re: Relative Namespaces, Charles Reitzel
      • Re: Relative Namespaces, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Relative Namespaces, Jeff Rafter
      • Re: Relative Namespaces, Martin Gudgin
      • Re: Relative Namespaces, Matt Sergeant
      • Re: Relative Namespaces, Charles Reitzel
      • Re: Relative Namespaces, Matt Sergeant
      • Re: Relative Namespaces, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Relative Namespaces, Matt Sergeant
      • Re: Relative Namespaces, Martin Gudgin
      • Re: Relative Namespaces, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Relative Namespaces, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Relative Namespaces, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Relative Namespaces, Thomas B. Passin
    • Re: PSVI in the Infoset Spec. (Re: Datatypes vs anarchy), Charles Reitzel
• Schemas and Semantics (was: A Personal Reply...), Matthew Gertner
  • RE: Schemas and Semantics (was: A Personal Reply...), David E. Cleary
  • RE: Schemas and Semantics (was: A Personal Reply...), Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Schemas and Semantics (was: A Personal Reply...), Rick Jelliffe
    • RE: Schemas and Semantics (was: A Personal Reply...), Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • RE: Schemas and Semantics (was: A Personal Reply...), Matthew Gertner
    • RE: Schemas and Semantics (was: A Personal Reply...), Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • RE: Schemas and Semantics (was: A Personal Reply...), Matthew Gertner
• RE: tolerating anarchy (was Re: Personal reply), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: tolerating anarchy (was Re: Personal reply), Simon St.Laurent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: tolerating anarchy (was Re: Personal reply), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: tolerating anarchy (was Re: Personal reply), Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: tolerating anarchy (was Re: Personal reply), Eric Bohlman
  • RE: tolerating anarchy (was Re: Personal reply), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• XML Schema restriction contradiction?, Lyndon J B Nixon
  • Re: XML Schema restriction contradiction?, Henry S. Thompson
• Wellformedness, Staffan Måhlén
  • Re: Wellformedness, Richard Tobin
• schema dialect conversion, Nick Laqua
• advocating XML, Rob Andrews
  • Re: advocating XML, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: advocating XML, Rob Andrews
      • Re: advocating XML, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: advocating XML, Paul T
      • Re: advocating XML, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: advocating XML, Paul T
      • Re: advocating XML, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: advocating XML, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: advocating XML, Thomas B. Passin
      • RE: advocating XML, Danny Ayers
      • Re: advocating XML, John Cowan
      • Bad Business (was Re: advocating XML), David Megginson
      • Re: Bad Business (was Re: advocating XML), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: advocating XML, Matt Sergeant
      • Re: advocating XML, Alexey Gokhberg
      • Re: advocating XML, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: advocating XML, Bob Kline
      • Re: advocating XML, Paul T
      • Re: advocating XML, Bob Kline
  • Re: advocating XML, Frank Boumphrey
    • Message not available
      • Re: advocating XML, Vasileios Papadimos
• RE: Datatypes vs anarchy, Michael Champion
  • Re: Datatypes vs anarchy, Ronald Bourret
  • RE: Datatypes vs anarchy, Simon St.Laurent
  • Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy), Sean McGrath
    • Message not available
      • Re: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy), Sam TH
    • RE: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy), Leigh Dodds
      • RE: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy), Sean McGrath
  • RE: Datatypes vs anarchy, Gavin Thomas Nicol
• Element content, Mick McRae
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Element content, Wayne Steele
    • Re: Element content, Ronald Bourret
• Re: typing (was RE: Personal reply), Charles Reitzel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: typing (was RE: Personal reply), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [ANNOUNCE] XML Cooktop 2.1 beta, XML Everywhere
• RE: Bad Business (was Re: advocating XML), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Bad Business (was Re: advocating XML), David Megginson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Bad Business (was Re: advocating XML), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Bad Business (was Re: advocating XML), Deborah Aleyne Lapeyre
    • Re: Bad Business (was Re: advocating XML), James Robertson
  • RE: Bad Business (was Re: advocating XML), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy), Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy), Sean McGrath
  • RE: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy), Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy), Rick Jelliffe
  • RE: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy), Michael Brennan
    • Re: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy), XML Everywhere
    • Re: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy), Ronald Bourret
  • RE: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy), Michael Brennan
    • Re: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy), Ronald Bourret
  • Re: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy), Rick Jelliffe
    • RE: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy), Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • RE: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy), Ronald Bourret
  • RE: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy), Michael Brennan
  • RE: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy), Michael Brennan
  • Re: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy), Rick Jelliffe
• patient info schema, Starostina Olga
  • Re: patient info schema, Jonathan Borden
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: patient info schema, Jonathan Robie
• Deadline for early-bird registration for XML Europe 2001, Elledge, Marion
• A simple guy with a simple problem, Sean McGrath
  • Re: A simple guy with a simple problem, Joe English
  • Re: A simple guy with a simple problem, John Cowan
  • Re: A simple guy with a simple problem, Paul T
    • Message not available
      • Re: A simple guy with a simple problem, Eric =?unknown-8bit?Q?B=F6se-Wolf?=
  • RE: A simple guy with a simple problem, Danny Ayers
  • Re: A simple guy with a simple problem, Tim Bray
  • Re: A simple guy with a simple problem, Dan Diebolt
  • RE: A simple guy with a simple problem, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: A simple guy with a simple problem, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: A simple guy with a simple problem, Sean McGrath
  • RE: A simple guy with a simple problem, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: A simple guy with a simple problem, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), Simon St.Laurent
    • RE: A simple guy with a simple problem, Tim Bray
      • RE: A simple guy with a simple problem, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • RE: A simple guy with a simple problem, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: A simple guy with a simple problem, Sean McGrath
    • RE: A simple guy with a simple problem, Danny Ayers
      • Re: A simple guy with a simple problem, Martin v. Loewis
      • Re: A simple guy with a simple problem, Sean McGrath
      • Re: A simple guy with a simple problem, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: A simple guy with a simple problem, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: A simple guy with a simple problem, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: A simple guy with a simple problem, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: A simple guy with a simple problem, Jonathan Borden
      • RE: A simple guy with a simple problem, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: A simple guy with a simple problem, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: A simple guy with a simple problem, Ronald Bourret
      • Re: A simple guy with a simple problem, Ronald Bourret
      • Re: A simple guy with a simple problem, Christopher R. Maden
      • Re: A simple guy with a simple problem, Martin v. Loewis
    • RE: A simple guy with a simple problem, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: A simple guy with a simple problem, Paul T
    • Re: A simple guy with a simple problem, Joe English
      • Re: A simple guy with a simple problem, Sean McGrath
      • Re: A simple guy with a simple problem, Martin v. Loewis
    • Re: A simple guy with a simple problem, Steven E. Harris
      • Re: A simple guy with a simple problem, Sean McGrath
      • Re: A simple guy with a simple problem, Steven E. Harris
      • Re: A simple guy with a simple problem, Martin v. Loewis
  • RE: A simple guy with a simple problem, HPyle
  • RE: A simple guy with a simple problem, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: A simple guy with a simple problem, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: A simple guy with a simple problem, Eric Bohlman
  • RE: A simple guy with a simple problem, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: A simple guy with a simple problem, McNally, David J. (LNG-MBC)
    • Re: A simple guy with a simple problem, Thomas B. Passin
  • RE: A simple guy with a simple problem, Staffan Måhlén
  • RE: A simple guy with a simple problem, McNally, David J. (LNG-MBC)
• Re: advocating XML Re: advocating XML Re:advocating XML Re: advocating XML Re: advocating XML, Ed Shaya
• The First 2 Layers Problem and a tentative solution, Alexander Nakhimovsky
• xml schema validation ?, Mandeep Bhatia
  • Re: xml schema validation ?, Jeff Rafter
  • Re: xml schema validation ?, Eddie Robertsson
• RE: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), John Cowan
    • Re: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), Tim Bray
      • Re: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), John Cowan
      • Re: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), Justin Couch
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), Kimbro Staken
    • RE: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), Tim Bray
      • Re: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), Lauren Wood
  • RE: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), Thomas B. Passin
  • RE: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), John Cowan
    • Message not available
      • Re: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), Sam TH
  • RE: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), Kimbro Staken
  • RE: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), Danny Ayers
  • RE: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), david barnes
  • RE: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), Eric Bohlman
• Names, Nmtokens, and Namespaces, Ronald Bourret
  • RE: Names, Nmtokens, and Namespaces, Jonathan Borden
    • RE: Names, Nmtokens, and ...., Richard Knapp
      • RE: Names, Nmtokens, and ...., Jonathan Borden
  • Re: Names, Nmtokens, and Namespaces, Thomas B. Passin
• 3-SAT Re: Blowout, Rick Jelliffe
• XML Encoding of XPath: DTD, Wayne Steele
• XML Encoding of XPath: Examples, Wayne Steele
  • Re: XML Encoding of XPath: Examples, Eric van der Vlist
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XML Encoding of XPath: Examples, Wayne Steele
    • RE: XML Encoding of XPath: Examples, Evan Lenz
      • Re: XML Encoding of XPath: Examples, Eric van der Vlist
      • RE: XML Encoding of XPath: Examples, Jonathan Borden
    • Re: XML Encoding of XPath: Examples, Dan Diebolt
      • RE: XML Encoding of XPath: Examples, Evan Lenz
      • RE: XML Encoding of XPath: Examples, Charles Reitzel
      • Re: XML Encoding of XPath: Examples, Paul T
      • RE: XML Encoding of XPath: Examples, Ingo Macherius
  • Re: XML Encoding of XPath: Examples, Murata Makoto
  • Re: XML Encoding of XPath: Examples, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: XML Encoding of XPath: Examples, Eric van der Vlist
    • Re: XML Encoding of XPath: Examples, John Cowan
  • Re: XML Encoding of XPath: Examples, Rick Jelliffe
    • RE: XML Encoding of XPath: Examples, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • Re: XML Encoding of XPath: Examples, Murata Makoto
• virgin xml user, Howard.Kidd
• What can be changed, and what cannot? (was: Re: Request for a poll), Michael Champion
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What can be changed, and what cannot? (was: Re: Request for a poll), Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: What can be changed, and what cannot? (was: Re: Request for a poll), Simon St.Laurent
• [ANN] eXcelon Stylus Studio 3.0 Beta 2 Now Available!, Christopher Parkerson
• Novice. Pointers please!, Rajesh Kommineni
  • Re: Novice. Pointers please!, Thomas B. Passin
• [ANN] eXcelon Ships Portal Server 3.0 Beta 2!, Christopher Parkerson
• XML tool kit recommendation for novice developer, Ronald Allen
  • RE: XML tool kit recommendation for novice developer, Christopher Parkerson
  • Re: XML tool kit recommendation for novice developer, Matt Sergeant
• Re: Who knows? (was RE:??? (was RE: A Simple Guy ...)), Michael Champion
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Who knows? (was RE:??? (was RE: A Simple Guy ...)), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• ER schema language (was Re: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vsanarchy)), Rick Jelliffe
• RE: What can be changed, and what cannot? (was: Re: Request for a poll), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: ER schema language (was Re: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy)), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Who knows?, Miles Sabin
• is there equivalent of unique-identifier datatype in XML SchemaDatatypes ?, Mandeep Bhatia
  • Re: is there equivalent of unique-identifier datatype in XMLSchemaDatatypes ?, Eddie Robertsson
• interop, not standards, Simon St.Laurent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: interop, not standards, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Attributes and enumerations, Richard Knapp
  • Re: Attributes and enumerations, Richard Tobin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Attributes and enumerations, Paul Grosso
    • Re: Attributes and enumerations, Richard Knapp
  • Re: Attributes and enumerations, Wayne Steele
• Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Tim Bray
  • RE: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Don Park
  • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Robin Cover
  • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, James Clark
    • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Tim Bray
      • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Rob Lugt
      • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Jesús Quiroga
      • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, John Cowan
      • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Jesús Quiroga
      • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Tim Bray
      • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, John Cowan
      • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Tim Bray
    • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Richard Tobin
  • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Mike Brown
  • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Dave Pawson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Rick Jelliffe
    • RE: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • RE: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Rob McDougall
  • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Edwin.Fine
    • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Richard Tobin
    • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, John Cowan
  • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Edwin.Fine
  • RE: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, HUGHES,MARK (Non-HP-FtCollins,ex1)
    • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, John Cowan
  • RE: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Susan Malaika
    • RE: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, John Cowan
      • RE: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • DOM appendChild question, David E. Cleary
      • Re: DOM appendChild question, K. Ari Krupnikov
      • Re: DOM appendChild question, Philippe Le Hegaret
    • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, John Cowan
  • RE: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Susan Malaika
    • RE: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Matt Sergeant
  • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Susan Malaika
    • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Rob Lugt
      • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, John Cowan
      • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Martin v. Loewis
  • RE: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Susan Malaika
    • RE: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Matt Sergeant
  • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Susan Malaika
    • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Matt Sergeant
      • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Martin v. Loewis
      • Newbie question - passing XML using POST, Stephen Young
      • Re: Newbie question - passing XML using POST, Dave Winer
      • Message not available
      • Re: Newbie question - passing XML using POST, Vasileios Papadimos
      • RE: Newbie question - passing XML using POST, Robert C. Lyons
      • Re: Newbie question - passing XML using POST, Heikki Toivonen
      • Re: Newbie question - passing XML using POST, Mike Brown
    • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, John Cowan
  • RE: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, Susan Malaika
  • RE: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, HUGHES,MARK (Non-HP-FtCollins,ex1)
    • Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;, John Cowan
• [Zvon] An article: About Multimodal ZVON, Miloslav Nic
• simple xml question, Howard.Kidd
  • Re: simple xml question, Jeff Rafter
    • Re: simple xml question, Thomas B. Passin
• Sample XML encoding of XPath, Matt Sergeant
• RE: ???(Offtopic) (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• .NET - all you wanted to know, Robin Cover
• First/last call for XML track at WWW10 Dev Day on 5 May 2001, Eve L. Maler
• XML Schemas now Proposed Recommendation at W3C, Rick Jelliffe
  • RDDL and XML Schemas Proposed Recommendation, Jeff Rafter
    • Re: RDDL and XML Schemas Proposed Recommendation, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: RDDL and XML Schemas Proposed Recommendation, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: RDDL and XML Schemas Proposed Recommendation, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: RDDL and XML Schemas Proposed Recommendation, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: RDDL and XML Schemas Proposed Recommendation, Justin Couch
      • URI resolver was Re: RDDL and XML Schemas Proposed Recommendation, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: URI resolver was Re: RDDL and XML Schemas Proposed Recommendation, Justin Couch
      • Message not available
      • Re: URI resolver was Re: RDDL and XML Schemas Proposed Recommendation, Michael Mealling
      • RE: URI resolver was Re: RDDL and XML Schemas Proposed Recommendation, Jonathan Borden
      • Message not available
      • Re: URI resolver was Re: RDDL and XML Schemas Proposed Recommendation, Michael Mealling
      • RE: URI resolver was Re: RDDL and XML Schemas Proposed Recommendation, Jonathan Borden
      • Message not available
      • Re: URI resolver was Re: RDDL and XML Schemas Proposed Recommendation, Michael Mealling
      • Re: URI resolver was Re: RDDL and XML Schemas Proposed Recommendation, Tim Bray
      • Message not available
      • Re: URI resolver was Re: RDDL and XML Schemas Proposed Recommendation, Michael Mealling
      • Re: URI resolver was Re: RDDL and XML Schemas Proposed Recommendation, Tim Bray
      • Message not available
      • Re: URI resolver was Re: RDDL and XML Schemas Proposed Recommendation, Michael Mealling
      • RE: URI resolver was Re: RDDL and XML Schemas Proposed Recommendation, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Message not available
      • Re: URI resolver was Re: RDDL and XML Schemas Proposed Recommendation, Michael Mealling
      • Re: URI resolver was Re: RDDL and XML Schemas Proposed Recommendation, Simon St.Laurent
      • Message not available
      • Re: URI resolver was Re: RDDL and XML Schemas Proposed Recommendation, Michael Mealling
      • Re: URI resolver, Sean B. Palmer
      • RE: URI resolver was Re: RDDL and XML Schemas Proposed Recommendation, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • RE: URI resolver was Re: RDDL and XML Schemas Proposed Recommendation, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: URI resolver was Re: RDDL and XML Schemas Proposed Recommendation, Justin Couch
      • RE: URI resolver was Re: RDDL and XML Schemas Proposed Recommendation, Charles Reitzel
      • Re: URI resolver was Re: RDDL and XML Schemas Proposed Recommendation, John Cowan
      • are there any tools like this?, hxzhang
      • Re: URI resolver was Re: RDDL and XML Schemas Proposed Recommendation, Justin Couch
      • Message not available
      • Re: URI resolver was Re: RDDL and XML Schemas Proposed Recommendation, Michael Mealling
      • Re: URI resolver was Re: RDDL and XML Schemas Proposed Recommendation, John Cowan
  • Re: XML Schemas now Proposed Recommendation at W3C, G. Ken Holman
    • Re: XML Schemas now Proposed Recommendation at W3C, Henry S. Thompson
• Can we achieve clarity at W3C re what XSL, XSL-FO and XSLT are?, AndrewWatt2000
  • Re: Can we achieve clarity at W3C re what XSL, XSL-FO and XSLT are?, James Clark
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Can we achieve clarity at W3C re what XSL, XSL-FO and XSLT are?, AndrewWatt2000
• EXPRESS Schemas, Rick Jelliffe
• SAX2 parser abort, Danny Ayers
  • Re: SAX2 parser abort, Rob Lugt
    • RE: SAX2 parser abort, Stephen Howard
• PyTREX 0.6.0 released, James Tauber
• [ANN] Turing Machine Markup Language, Robert C. Lyons
  • Re: [ANN] Turing Machine Markup Language, Thomas B. Passin
    • RE: [ANN] Turing Machine Markup Language, Gavin Thomas Nicol
• Possible small RDDL enhancement, Tim Bray
  • RE: Possible small RDDL enhancement, Jonathan Borden
  • Re: Possible small RDDL enhancement, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: Possible small RDDL enhancement, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Possible small RDDL enhancement, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Possible small RDDL enhancement, Jonathan Borden
  • RE: Possible small RDDL enhancement, Jason Diamond
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Possible small RDDL enhancement, Rick Jelliffe
• Best Practice for this problem?, Paul Spencer
  • Re: Best Practice for this problem?, Henry S. Thompson
• Good XML Websites, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: Good XML Websites, jackson
    • RE: Good XML Websites, Lynda VanVleet
  • Re: Good XML Websites, Christian Nentwich
  • Message not available
    • Re: Good XML Websites, Steve Tinney
• Good HTML Web sites (Was: Good XML Websites), AndrewWatt2000
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Good HTML Web sites (Was: Good XML Websites), Rick Jelliffe
• PyXML 0.6.5 is released, Martin v. Loewis
  • Re: PyXML 0.6.5 is released, Bob Kline
    • Re: PyXML 0.6.5 is released, Martin v. Loewis
      • Re: PyXML 0.6.5 is released, Bob Kline
• Re: Newbie question - passing XML using POST, Bill Cummings
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Newbie question - passing XML using POST, Michael Brennan
  • RE: Newbie question - passing XML using POST, Stephen Young
    • RE: Newbie question - passing XML using POST, Robert C. Lyons
  • RE: Newbie question - passing XML using POST, Joe Klemke
  • RE: Newbie question - passing XML using POST, Michael Brennan
• Revised list (Re: Good XML Websites), Rick Jelliffe
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Revised list (Re: Good XML websites), Nik O
    • Message not available
      • Re: Revised list (Re: Good XML websites), Edd Dumbill
  • Re: Revised list (Re: Good XML websites), Rick Jelliffe
• XML Schema: Formal Description is now published, Jonathan Robie
  • Re: XML Schema: Formal Description is now published, Jonathan Borden
• generating an DOM object from a non-XML source in Java, Newman, Todd
  • Re: generating an DOM object from a non-XML source in Java, Ronald Bourret
    • Re: generating an DOM object from a non-XML source in Java, Mike Brown
  • Re: generating an DOM object from a non-XML source in Java, Jurgen
  • RE: generating an DOM object from a non-XML source in Java, Danny Ayers
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: generating an DOM object from a non-XML source in Java, Newman, Todd
    • OT: XSL Question, Rajesh Kommineni
      • Re: OT: XSL Question, Eddie Robertsson
• [Fwd:$BAj8_1?MQ$N$?$a$K(BXML$B$K$7(B $B$P$j$r@_$1$kOC(B (Fw:DTD$B=8$N(BURL )], TAKAHASHI Hideo(BSD-13G)
  • Re:[Fwd:$BAj8_1?MQ$N$?$a$K(BXML$B$K(B $B$7$P$j$r@_$1$kOC(B (Fw:DTD$B=8$N(BURL )], TAKAHASHI Hideo(BSD-13G)
• java.lang.SecurityException: sealing violation, Anne Beug
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: java.lang.SecurityException: sealing violation, Michael Brennan
    • FOLLOW UP: java.lang.SecurityException: sealing violation, Anne Beug
• ANN: eXist 0.3 released, Wolfgang Meier
• Potential bug in Oracle XML Parser 2.0.7.0.0 (C) xslprocess() xslprocessex() functions, craig.patterson
  • Re: Potential bug in Oracle XML Parser 2.0.7.0.0 (C) xslprocess()xslprocessex() functions, Steve Muench
• FW: Word 2000 html output into content and style, Bovone Stefano
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Word 2000 html output into content and style, Jonathan Borden
• A compact toolkit for parsing and manipulating XML, Kelli Wiginton
• RE: XSL Question, craig.patterson
• Best practices: Namespaces, versions and RDDL, Eric van der Vlist
  • Re: Best practices: Namespaces, versions and RDDL, David Carlisle
    • Re: Best practices: Namespaces, versions and RDDL, Charles Reitzel
      • Re: Best practices: Namespaces, versions and RDDL, Eric van der Vlist
• No Subject, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: Structured Data Exchange Format (SDXF), Tom Bradford
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • No Subject, paulo
• HTML --> XHTML --> XML Conversion (HTML Scraping), Gul Imran
  • RE: HTML --> XHTML --> XML Conversion (HTML Scraping), Michael Fitzgerald
  • Re: HTML --> XHTML --> XML Conversion (HTML Scraping), Thomas B. Passin
• DOM Conformance Test Suites, Philippe Le Hegaret
• Icebergs - XML file metrics, Robin LaFontaine
  • Re: Icebergs - XML file metrics, Ronald Bourret
  • Re: Icebergs - XML file metrics, Charles Reitzel
  • Re: Icebergs - XML file metrics, Stefan Zier
    • Re: Icebergs - XML file metrics, Robin LaFontaine
• html binding, Sunil Rampersad
• ANN: examplotron., Eric van der Vlist
  • Re: ANN: examplotron., John Cowan
    • Re: ANN: examplotron., Eric van der Vlist
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ANN: examplotron., Murata Makoto
    • RE: ANN: examplotron., Jonathan Borden
      • Re: ANN: examplotron., Murata Makoto
      • RE: ANN: examplotron., Jonathan Borden
    • Re: ANN: examplotron., Eric van der Vlist
  • Re: ANN: examplotron., Murata Makoto
• RE: examplotron., Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: examplotron., Eric van der Vlist
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: examplotron., Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: examplotron., Eric van der Vlist
• Web Philosophy, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Web Philosophy, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Web Philosophy, Michael Beddow
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Sean B. Palmer
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Martin v. Loewis
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Ken North
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Martin v. Loewis
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: Web Philosophy, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Ronald Bourret
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Ann Navarro
      • RE: Web Philosophy, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • RE: Web Philosophy, Danny Ayers
      • RE: Web Philosophy, Ann Navarro
      • RE: Web Philosophy, Danny Ayers
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Martin v. Loewis
      • experts, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: experts, Dave Winer
      • Re: experts, John Cowan
      • Re: experts, Dave Winer
      • RE: experts, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: experts, Dave Winer
      • Re: experts, Marcus Carr
      • Re: experts, Dave Winer
      • RE: experts, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: experts, Dave Winer
      • RE: experts, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • RE: experts, James Robertson
      • RE: experts, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: experts, Marcus Carr
      • Re: experts, Kimbro Staken
      • Re: experts, Marcus Carr
      • Re: experts, Kimbro Staken
      • Re: experts, Marcus Carr
      • Re: experts, Tim Bray
      • Re: experts, Dave Winer
      • RE: experts, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: experts, Dave Winer
      • Re: experts, Tom Bradford
      • RE: experts, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Bug report, Dave Winer
      • Re: "Invited experts", Deborah Aleyne Lapeyre
      • Re: experts, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: experts, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: experts, Marcus Carr
      • Re: experts, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: experts, Marcus Carr
      • Re: experts, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: experts, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • RE: experts, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: experts, Tim Bray
      • Re: experts, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: Web Philosophy, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Ronald Bourret
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Ann Navarro
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Ann Navarro
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Eve L. Maler
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Ronald Bourret
      • RE: Web Philosophy, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Ann Navarro
      • RE: Web Philosophy, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Ronald Bourret
      • RE: Web Philosophy, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Martin v. Loewis
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Ronald Bourret
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Ann Navarro
      • Re: Web Philosophy, david barnes
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Martin v. Loewis
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Frank Boumphrey
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Ann Navarro
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Ann Navarro
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Eric van der Vlist
      • RE: Web Philosophy, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Martin v. Loewis
      • RE: Web Philosophy, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Martin v. Loewis
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: Web Philosophy, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Ann Navarro
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Sean B. Palmer
      • Re: Web Philosophy, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: Web Philosophy, Danny Ayers
      • W3 Language RFC (was RE: Web Philosophy), Danny Ayers
  • RE: Web Philosophy, Michael Champion
  • Re: Web Philosophy, Michael Champion
  • RE: Web Philosophy, Derek Denny-Brown
  • Re: Web Philosophy, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: Web Philosophy, Uche Ogbuji
  • Re: Web Philosophy, Ann Navarro
  • RE: Web Philosophy, Matthew Gertner
    • RE: Web Philosophy, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • RE: Web Philosophy, Matthew Gertner
  • RE: Web Philosophy, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• looking for old date/email uri scheme proposal, Dan Brickley
• examplotron v0.2, Eric van der Vlist
• HTML scraping, Arnaud Sahuguet
  • Re: HTML scraping, XML Everywhere
• Announcing Developmentor's XML Tutorial, Aaron Skonnard
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Announcing Developmentor's XML Tutorial, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Announcing Developmentor's XML Tutorial, david barnes
      • Re: Announcing Developmentor's XML Tutorial, Martin Gudgin
      • Re: Announcing Developmentor's XML Tutorial, david barnes
  • RE: Announcing Developmentor's XML Tutorial, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Combining float/string to specify value/units, Steve Rosenberry
  • Re: Combining float/string to specify value/units, Thomas B. Passin
    • Re: Combining float/string to specify value/units, Steve Rosenberry
      • Re: Combining float/string to specify value/units, Eddie Robertsson
      • Re: Combining float/string to specify value/units, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Combining float/string to specify value/units, Steve Rosenberry
      • XML Schema Part 2 should provide BNF for all primitive types., Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI
      • Re: Combining float/string to specify value/units, Steve Rosenberry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Combining float/string to specify value/units, Wayne Steele
    • Re: Combining float/string to specify value/units, Steve Rosenberry
  • Re: Combining float/string to specify value/units, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: Combining float/string to specify value/units, Rick Jelliffe
• Examplotron 0.3 [1], Eric van der Vlist
• ID?, Richard Knapp
  • Re: ID?, Marcus Carr
• Xpath expression generator, Shahaf Abileah
• Multi-stage schema validation and schema design, Mike_Leditschke
• Examplotron for rss 1.0 and request for comments, Eric van der Vlist
  • RE: Examplotron..., Gavin Thomas Nicol
    • Re: Examplotron..., Eric van der Vlist
  • Examplotron 0.4 (with import and placeholders), Eric van der Vlist
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Examplotron for rss 1.0 and request for comments, Eric van der Vlist
• Are namespace declarations 'counted' as attributes?, Edmund Mitchell
  • Re: Are namespace declarations 'counted' as attributes?, Rob Lugt
    • Re: Are namespace declarations 'counted' as attributes?, Ronald Bourret
      • Re: Are namespace declarations 'counted' as attributes?, Richard Tobin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Are namespace declarations 'counted' as attributes?, Edmund Mitchell
    • Re: Are namespace declarations 'counted' as attributes?, Richard Tobin
• webMethods' XML Schema for XSLT 1.0, Asir S Vedamuthu
• ebXML released?, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: ebXML released?, Eric van der Vlist
  • Re: ebXML released?, Anders W. Tell
• XNS (eXtensible Name Service), Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: XNS (eXtensible Name Service), Gavin Thomas Nicol
• W3C openness, participation, innovation, etc. (was re: Web Philosophy), Michael Champion
  • RE: W3C openness, participation, innovation,etc. (was re: Web Philosophy), Gavin Thomas Nicol
• Should examplotron stay on xml-dev ?, Eric van der Vlist
  • Re: Should examplotron stay on xml-dev ?, Tom Bradford
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Should examplotron stay on xml-dev ?, Rick Jelliffe
• XML Europe 2001 offers extensive training for XML and related technologies.and more!, Elledge, Marion
• Extreme Markup Languages 2001 Conference, Steven R. Newcomb
• Re: experts, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: experts, Tim Bray
  • Re: experts, John Cowan
  • Internationalization..., Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: experts, AndrewWatt2000
    • RE: experts, Paul Spencer
  • RE: experts, Bill dehOra
  • Re: experts, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: experts, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: experts, Mike.Champion
    • humility (was RE: experts), Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: humility (was RE: experts), Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • RE: humility (was RE: experts), Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: humility (was RE: experts), Gavin Thomas Nicol
    • People like me (was "experts"), Jonathan Robie
      • Re: People like me (was "experts"), Thomas B. Passin
  • RE: experts, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: experts, John Cowan
    • RE: experts, Lauren Wood
    • RE: experts, Jonathan Robie
  • RE: experts, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: experts, John Cowan
  • RE: experts, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: experts, Justin Couch
  • RE: experts, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: experts, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• XML as a pattern, Rick Jelliffe
• PyTREX Feature Complete, James Tauber
• W3C Curmudgeon (Was Re: Web Philosophy), AndrewWatt2000
  • Re: W3C Curmudgeon (Was Re: Web Philosophy), Ronald Bourret
• CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Richard Lanyon
  • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Richard Tobin
    • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Richard Lanyon
      • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, David Brownell
      • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Richard Lanyon
      • RE: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • RE: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Richard Lanyon
      • RE: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Ronald Bourret
      • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Martin v. Loewis
  • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, John Cowan
    • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Richard Lanyon
      • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Richard Tobin
      • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Richard Lanyon
      • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Richard Tobin
    • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Francis Norton
  • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Joe English
    • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Richard Tobin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Mike.Champion
    • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Francis Norton
    • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Martin v. Loewis
      • RE: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • RE: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Richard Lanyon
      • RE: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Martin v. Loewis
      • RE: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Martin v. Loewis
      • RE: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Richard Lanyon
  • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Rick Jelliffe
  • RE: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Mike.Champion
  • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Bob Kline
    • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, John Cowan
      • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, John Cowan
      • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Charles Reitzel
      • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Richard Tobin
      • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Bob Kline
      • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, John Cowan
      • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Bob Kline
    • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, John Aldridge
      • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Bob Kline
      • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, John Aldridge
      • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Bob Kline
      • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, David Carlisle
      • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Bob Kline
      • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, David Carlisle
      • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Bob Kline
    • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Tim Bray
      • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Bob Kline
      • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Charles Reitzel
      • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Bob Kline
      • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Richard Tobin
  • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Richard Tobin
  • RE: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Mike.Champion
    • RE: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Bob Kline
• The Web's Full Potential (Was Re: experts), AndrewWatt2000
  • Re: The Web's Full Potential (Was Re: experts), Ann Navarro
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Web's Full Potential (Was Re: experts), Rick Jelliffe
• XML generator in C++, Pallavi Mahajan
• ANN: XMLForms 1.0, Matthew Gertner
• Syntax Sugar and XML information models, Michael Champion
  • RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • Re: Syntax Sugar and XML information models, Martin v. Loewis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models, Michael Champion
    • Re: Syntax Sugar and XML information models, Martin v. Loewis
    • RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models, John Aldridge
  • RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models, Wayne Steele
  • Re: Syntax Sugar and XML information models, Rick Jelliffe
    • RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: Syntax Sugar and XML information models, Thomas B. Passin
    • Re: Syntax Sugar and XML information models, John Aldridge
    • Re: Syntax Sugar and XML information models, W. E. Perry
  • RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models, Mike.Champion
    • attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Simon St.Laurent
• Problem building Microsoft's SAX2Jumpstart, Steve Rosenberry
• Managing e-zines with JavaMail and XSLT, Part 1, Kelli Wiginton
• more namespace abuse, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: more namespace abuse, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • Re: more namespace abuse, Bob Kline
  • Re: more namespace abuse, Robin Berjon
  • Re: more namespace abuse, Tim Bray
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: more namespace abuse, Michael Brennan
    • Re: more namespace abuse, John Cowan
  • Re: more namespace abuse, Wayne Steele
  • RE: more namespace abuse, Michael Rys
    • RE: more namespace abuse, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: more namespace abuse, Michael Brennan
  • RE: more namespace abuse, Michael Brennan
  • RE: more namespace abuse, Michael Brennan
• Now playing on TechNetCast: David Megginson, Ken North
  • Free ebXML and UDDI classes (April 9,10 at New York Marriott Marquis), Ken North
• [ANN] PowerXML beta, Ramin Firoozye
• RDF Schema and XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes, Lee Iverson
  • Re: RDF Schema and XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes, Eric van der Vlist
    • RE: RDF Schema and XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: RDF Schema and XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes, Eric van der Vlist
• Announce: A Busy Developer's Guide to SOAP 1.1, Dave Winer
  • Re: Announce: A Busy Developer's Guide to SOAP 1.1, Joel Bender
    • Re: Announce: A Busy Developer's Guide to SOAP 1.1, Dave Winer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Announce: A Busy Developer's Guide to SOAP 1.1, Dave Winer
• looking for information on XML/Services, Satyajit Suri
• RE: [SOAP] Announce: A Busy Developer's Guide to SOAP 1.1, Michael Brennan
• Should we let XT fade away (Last Call), Eric van der Vlist
  • Re: Should we let XT fade away (Last Call), Matt Sergeant
• XSLT benchmarks, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: XSLT benchmarks, Matt Sergeant
• RE: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Mike.Champion
  • RE: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Robin Berjon
    • RE: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • RE: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Jonathan Borden
    • RE: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Tim Bray
      • RE: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Christopher R. Maden
      • RE: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Gavin Thomas Nicol
    • Re: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Joe English
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Rick Jelliffe
    • RE: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • RE: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • Re: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Rick Jelliffe
    • RE: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Thomas B. Passin
      • multiple types (Re: attribute order), Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: multiple types (Re: attribute order), Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: multiple types, Jonathan Borden
      • RE: multiple types, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: multiple types, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: multiple types (Re: attribute order), Thomas B. Passin
      • RE: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Martin v. Loewis
      • RE: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Justin Couch
      • Re: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML informationmodels), Justin Couch
      • Re: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML informationmodels), Martin v. Loewis
      • Re: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Jeff Greif
      • Re: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Jeff Greif
      • Re: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Martin v. Loewis
      • RE: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Tim Bray
      • RE: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Matt Sergeant
      • RE: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Christopher R. Maden
      • RE: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Joe English
      • Anyone got a SAX2 filter for xml:base ?, Ron Daniel
  • Re: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Simon St.Laurent
    • RE: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Gavin Thomas Nicol
• OASIS TC call for participation: Election and Voter Services, Karl Best
• Lauren Wood, SoftQuad Software,to Chair XML 2001 --- GCA announc ed today, Elledge, Marion
• RDF_PI, Danny Ayers
• validating schema instance with xerces?, LKirschner
  • RE: validating schema instance with xerces?, John F. Schlesinger
• SQL Generation, Phil Ruelle
  • Re: SQL Generation, Jurgen
    • Re: SQL Generation, Steve Muench
    • RE: SQL Generation, Danny Ayers
• [ANN] Idoox WASP (Web Application and Services Platform) - efficientdevelopment, testing and deployment of SOAP Web Services, Zdenek Svoboda
• java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError with Xalan and Xerces, Dan Diebolt
• IBM developerWorks opens XML DevCon 2001 newsgroup -- feel free to post, Ken North
• Announce: A brief history of SOAP (was RE: Announce: A Busy Developer's Guide to SOAP 1.1), Box, Don
• Spinning your XML for screens of all sizes, Kelli Wiginton
• HTTP messages as XML, cks
  • Re: HTTP messages as XML, Eric van der Vlist
  • Re: HTTP messages as XML, Simon St.Laurent
• XSV, XSU changed to accommodate revised XML Schema PR draft, Henry S. Thompson
• user friendly XML, David Brownell
  • Re: user friendly XML, Simon St.Laurent
• Heads up: A key difference between SOAP and XML-RPC, Dave Winer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Heads up: A key difference between SOAP and XML-RPC, Mike.Champion
    • Re: Heads up: A key difference between SOAP and XML-RPC, Dave Winer
  • RE: Heads up: A key difference between SOAP and XML-RPC, Box, Don
• Yet another plea for peace (was RE: Announce: A brief history of SOAP), Box, Don
  • A plea for interop (Re: Yet another plea for peace (was RE: Announce:A brief history of SOAP)), Dave Winer